Effect of height and gravity on the size of fruit in a tree?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shivakumar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Height
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of height and gravity on the size of fruit in trees, particularly focusing on guavas. Participants explore various scientific reasons behind the observed size distribution of fruits at different heights on a tree, considering factors such as flower development, pollination, and environmental conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the largest guava fruits are found at an average height between the topmost and bottommost fruits, questioning the scientific reasons for this observation.
  • Others argue that the size of fruit is influenced by the position of flowers, pollination, and the management practices of orchardists.
  • One participant mentions that the difference in gravitational force (g) between the top and bottom of a tree is negligible, proposing a calculation exercise to illustrate this point.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that fruit size may be affected by genetic factors, suggesting that fruit in the middle of the tree may be less desirable due to historical picking patterns.
  • Some participants highlight the role of environmental factors such as sunlight, nutrients, humidity, and wind speed in fruit development across different heights.
  • There is a discussion about the impact of rootstock on fruit quality and yield, with references to grafting practices in orchards.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between fruit size and height, with no consensus reached. Some focus on environmental and genetic factors, while others emphasize cultivation practices and the role of gravity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of factors influencing fruit size, including confounding variables such as tree management, environmental conditions, and genetic influences, which complicate the relationship between height and fruit size.

shivakumar
Messages
12
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
how is the distribution of size of fruits effected by height in relation to length of root tip to fruit and gravity?
I have seen largest guava fruits are in height of plant that is average of top most and bottom most fruit in the plant?
can there be a scientific reason for these observation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it is the fact, I believe there are scientific reasons there.
 
The leaves in many trees vary in size over its height. I heard that it's to make best use of the incident sunlight all over the tree. There may be a gradient of nutrients as you go up - and humidity and wind speed and insect pest population even.

One thing I can be pretty sure of is that the difference in g between to and bottom would be negligible. An exercise for the student: Calculate the difference in g for a 10m tree at an distance from the Centre of Earth of 6000km, using the inverse square law. The same would apply to trees grown at different heights.
 
There certainly will be science in fruit production.

Fundamentally, the position of fruit in a tree, will depend on where the flowers develop, and if, or how, they were pollinated.

Since flowers in some species, can be stimulated by pruning during winter, it is the exposure to storms, or management by an orchardist, that decides the shape of the tree.

Each branch of a fruit tree will have an individual capacity to support fruit development. If all fruit develops, the fruit will be small. The largest individual fruit will be found where excess fruit was removed by pressure from adjacent fruit in the wind, by animals, or by management.

Scientifically, the theory of gravity is the fruit of an apple tree, and Newton's mind.
 
Baluncore said:
There certainly will be science in fruit production.

Fundamentally, the position of fruit in a tree, will depend on where the flowers develop, and if, or how, they were pollinated.

Since flowers in some species, can be stimulated by pruning during winter, it is the exposure to storms, or management by an orchardist, that decides the shape of the tree.

Each branch of a fruit tree will have an individual capacity to support fruit development. If all fruit develops, the fruit will be small. The largest individual fruit will be found where excess fruit was removed by pressure from adjacent fruit in the wind, by animals, or by management.

Scientifically, the theory of gravity is the fruit of an apple tree, and Newton's mind.
I suspect you totally missed the point of the Q

how is the distribution of size of fruits effected by height in relation to length of root tip to fruit and gravity?

The OP wasnt talking about cultivated trees etc
just pick any fruit tree and forget about any cultivating. pollination etc etc

Then answer that Q :wink: :smile:
 
davenn said:
I suspect you totally missed the point of the Q
I suspect there is no significant relationship between the size of the fruit and the distance of the fruit from the root tip. There are far too many confounding parameters that I mentioned, for it to be that simple.

Gravity and capillary action will limit the fruit to be below about 125 metres above the ground. How are you going to measure the distance from the fruit to the tip of the root? Which piece of fruit, to which root tip?
davenn said:
The OP wasnt talking about cultivated trees etc
That surprises me, since the OP gave only one example, the guava, a tree cultivated throughout the tropics and subtropics. I would expect the OP's observations were made in guava orchards, where the trees are trained, to produce the maximum weight of fruit each year, over a range of height, such that it could be harvested safely.
davenn said:
Then answer that Q
If you don't like my answer, then you should read up on the subject and answer it yourself. I would be really interested in your answer.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Consider the progression of the growing season instead of apparent differences in fruit size due to position or height on the fruit tree. Allowing for minor variation in size, fruit is harvested when ripe.

Ripe fruit from a tree is generally of similar size, color and shape with minor variations*. Tree fruits such as cherries, olives, oranges, lemons, limes, coconuts, dates and apricots develop over the growing season but are harvested when the (individual) fruit is ripe.

Whether wild, plucked and eaten by birds and animals, or cultivated and harvested by humans, unripe fruit is left to develop and ripe fruit selected to eat. Thus the origin of the expression cherry picking.

*Grafts are one exception to generally uniform fruit on a tree. Our family orchard in Northern California grew apricot trees originally from Mediterranean environs with grafts from plum trees.

Pollination also caused hybridization where a single tree might produce apricots, plums, and pluots on different branches at various times in the season.
 
Baluncore said:
That surprises me, since the OP gave only one example, the guava, a tree cultivated throughout the tropics and subtropics. I would expect the OP's observations were made in guava orchards, where the trees are trained, to produce the maximum weight of fruit each year, over a range of height, such that it could be harvested safely.
I have no idea what a guava tree is, size or height, nor what the fruit looks like, nor how it is harvested.
I will just throw out there that this could be a prime example of genetics at work.
If the middle fruit were the ones picked first in eons back in the day, since one did not need to crouch down, nor extend up ( for animals as well as humans ), but instead go for the easy pickings while looking out for predators, the tree genetically modified the fruit size disparity so that the smallest, and least favourable to be able to continue the lineage are in this middle easier pickable position, so that it expends less energy and resources in middle location versus top and bottom.
shivakumar said:
TL;DR Summary: how is the distribution of size of fruits effected by height in relation to length of root tip to fruit and gravity?

I have seen largest guava fruits are in height of plant that is average of top most and bottom most fruit in the plant?
I have some difficulty parsing the expression.
I think that says fat fruit on top and bottom, and smaller fruit in the middle.
And have presented my hypothesis of genetics being responsible for middle fruit being less desirable based on the parsing.
 
Klystron said:
Our family orchard in Northern California grew apricot trees originally from Mediterranean environs with grafts from plum trees.
Growing seed, hybridised by cross-pollination, leads to lower value fruit, on a weaker rootstock, with all trees producing slightly different fruit. It is rare that the best fruit come with the best roots, or the best structured tree.

The highest value fruit is grown on the strongest root stock. So, cuttings, (tissue culture), pruned from the branches of the best fruit tree, are grafted onto the most vigorous rootstock, usually a plum, to get a well-structured tree, with the best yield of consistent high value fruit, from the grafted tree branches.

Where several novelty garden species are grafted onto one rootstock, that rootstock, after a few years, will favour some grafts over others. That leads to the situation where the tree becomes asymmetric, and yield falls.

Commercial orchards do not mix species, or varieties, on the same rootstock. The supermarkets want consistency from a monoculture, so customers will not pick and choose between the packs of fruit.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #10
Baluncore said:
Where several novelty garden species are grafted onto one rootstock, that rootstock, after a few years, will favour some grafts over others. That leads to the situation where the tree becomes asymmetric, and yield falls.

Commercial orchards do not mix species, or varieties, on the same rootstock.
This all reads as true in my experience with apricots and plums. Grafts were performed on individual trees as a hobby. I inherited some truly oddball trees over the years.

My favorite tree, also the subject of several drawings and paintings due its strangely shaped limbs, produced delicious sweet almonds for several seasons, then changed to plums for one year, then no production. Reasonably sure of plum rootstock.

I brought up grafts as the exception to the general rule that these (commercial) trees produce monotonous uniform fruit. Guavas might vary in size more than plums or 'cots, as avocado sizes vary, without contradicting this premise.

Living in warm climates, I have no experience with apple orchards but I understand from reading that "Johnny Appleseed" was mostly myth. Wild and feral apples trees produce poor fruit, mainly suitable for cider. Delicious eating apples grow from grafts on selected rootstock?

How the large varieties of commercial apples are produced would make an interesting subject of another thread.
 
  • #11
But the gravity effect??? There are very very few frontier breaking Earthbound experiments that cannot assume a uniform gravitational field so the fruit growing can pretty safely be said not to be affected by any gravitational oddities in horticulture.
That's one less worry for the food industry.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Klystron

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
13K
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
792
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K