Effect of thickness of atmosphere on the incident light on land

AI Thread Summary
If Earth's atmosphere were significantly thicker, the whiteness of snow could appear red due to increased scattering of blue light, allowing predominantly red wavelengths to reflect off the snow. The discussion highlights that atmospheric absorption and scattering would alter the spectrum of incident sunlight, particularly affecting non-optical frequencies like microwaves. Thicker atmospheres would enhance the absorption effects of denser, rarer molecules, leading to more pronounced color changes. Additionally, human perception would likely adapt to these changes, similar to how we perceive white objects under different artificial lighting. Overall, a thicker atmosphere would significantly impact both the light spectrum and our visual perception of snow.
Pranav Jha
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
How would the whiteness of snow appear if Earth's atmosphere were several times thicker?

I think it would appear red as most of the blue frequency light would be scattered before reaching the Earth and the majority of light being reflected of the snow would be red.

Am i right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Whilst this must be an effect, I think the difference in absorption at the different frequencies, as well as the scattering, would have an effect in the spectrum of the light reaching the ground.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Whilst this must be an effect, I think the difference in absorption at the different frequencies, as well as the scattering, would have an effect in the spectrum of the light reaching the ground.

Could you please be more detailed about the effects you were referring to in the above answer?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_Spectrum.png"
If you look at this link it shows that atmospheric absorption modifies the spectrum (in the fine detail) of the incident Sunlight in addition to the effect of Raleigh scattering (the general trend). Absorption effects are more marked at non-optical frequencies, of course, with huge amounts of absorption of microwave frequencies by water vapour. Both effects on the optical bands would get more and more pronounced as the atmosphere gets thicker and thicker.
I have a feeling that, in a thicker atmosphere, the effects of absorption by some of the more dense but more rare molecules (which collect more in the bottom layers) would be more marked than at the present atmospheric thickness and pressure. This would produce proportionally more noticeable colouring.

I assume you are taking snow to be a good reflector of light at all wavelengths, producing what we would call 'white' with the Sun overhead. Our (brain) colour compensation circuits do a lot better than those in cameras and I have a feeling that we would very soon accept a modified version of this if we were to spend much time under a more dense atmosphere, in much the same way as we 'see' white things as white under tungsten and flourescent lights.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top