Effective Current Impedance Calculation without Inductive Coupling

  • Thread starter Thread starter radicaled
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating effective current impedance without considering inductive coupling. The impedance is calculated using the formula Z = √(R² + (Xl - Xc)²), resulting in a magnitude of 1414.21Ω. It is noted that while the impedance magnitude can be treated as a simple resistance for current calculations, it does not provide phase information related to the applied voltage. The importance of using complex impedance for accurate phase calculations is emphasized. Inductive coupling, which involves the interaction of inductors through a mutual magnetic field, is to be disregarded in this scenario.
radicaled
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The exercise goes like this:
- Obtain the impedance
- Current effective without inductive coupling

Data:
v(t) = 100 sin(1000t + π/3)
R = 1kΩ
L1 = L2 = 1H
C= 1μC

Resolution:
Z = \sqrt{R^2 + (Xl - Xc)^2}
Z = \sqrt{1000^2 + (1000.2 - \frac{1}{1000 1x10^{-6}})^2}
Z = 1414,21Ω

Now, what is the inductive coupling
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without a circuit diagram the question is ambiguous. Can you provide a circuit diagram and the original problem statement?
 
Ok, I have attached the circuit.
As for the problem statement its the same. I may rephrase, because I have to translate it
- Obtain the impedance
- The effective current without inductive coupling
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 408
You've calculated a magnitude for the impedance, but the impedance itself will be a complex value (real and imaginary parts). You can find the magnitude of the current that flows by treating the impedance magnitude as though it were a simple resistance. Note that this will not provide current phase information (with respect to the applied voltage, which as you should note, has its own specified phase). For the phase information you will have to use the complex impedance and perform the calculation using complex arithmetic.

Inductive coupling is the interaction of inductors that share a mutual magnetic field; current in one inductor induces a current in the other, and vice-versa. Apparently you're asked to ignore such a coupling in this problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top