Effective Project Logging: Tips and Strategies for Keeping Track of Your Work

  • Thread starter Thread starter thegreenlaser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Project
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on strategies for maintaining an effective project log, particularly for long-term projects. Participants share their experiences and methods for recording work, ideas, and progress, while expressing challenges in determining what information is essential to retain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in identifying what should be included in a project log versus what is rough work, seeking tips on effective logging methods.
  • Another participant advocates for using small composition notebooks with graph-paper pages, suggesting a coding system by date and separating important notes from casual scribbles.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a bound notebook for documenting everything, highlighting that it should serve as a stream of consciousness without erasing or removing pages.
  • Some participants propose the idea of maintaining separate notebooks or documents for rough ideas and relevant work, to streamline the information for presentations while retaining a record of all thoughts.
  • Concerns are raised about the challenge of distinguishing between project-related ideas and random thoughts, especially in iterative work like computer modeling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single effective method for project logging, as multiple competing views and strategies are presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying requirements for logging based on their jobs, with some needing to adhere to specific formats or submission protocols, which may influence their logging practices.

thegreenlaser
Messages
524
Reaction score
17
Like the title says, I'm trying to figure out how I can keep an effective log of the stuff I've done in a project. I'm particularly curious about ways to keep a good project log for a long project (i.e. longer than a month). I've tried to do it, but I have a lot of trouble figuring out exactly what needs to go into the log and what is just rough work and should stay out. I tend to do a lot of rough work, jotting random ideas down, deriving formulas, or trying to help myself visualize something. If I just keep all of that, I end up with an excessive amount of paper, and it's really hard to go through and get anything useful. At the same time, I find myself often wishing I could look back at a little idea I had a while ago for various reasons, and I've been wishing that I was better at keeping records of my thoughts, but I can never seem to figure out at the time what might be important later and what won't be. Does anyone have any tips, or could anyone share their system for keeping records of what they've done or thought of in a project?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like teeny composition-size notebooks that have graph-paper pages -- like 100 pages total and 5 squares/inch grid. I guess I've been much better when I've used these smaller notebooks (to limit the date range). I code my data by date... so if I know what data I'm analyzing on my computer, but want to details I would have written in the notebook, then it's easy to find. To make things even more sparse, I try to use the "front side only" (or right page) for important notes what's going on with the project itself at the present moment (settings about the system for certain named data files, etc.), and the "back side" for scribbling other stuff (notes about conversations with others, possible directions the project might go, little math "scribbles" or system "doodles" etc. This makes for a fair number of little notebooks on the shelf -- depending on how large you write and how much, maybe 4-5 or more per year), but at least nothing really large on the desk or lab table at one time.

Note however, that I do know some friends whose jobs require them to use a certain type of notebook (with carbon-copy pages) and submit the copies to their company (sometimes each day). For that, obviously you're stuck just what the company/lab might want. And in my experience, those things are rather large ( Nonetheless, you might be able to divide your page in half or something. Or maybe use different colors of pen. Black for your directly project related stuff, and blue for random asides.
 
The best thing to do is write everything into a bound notebook/lab book. Every couple of days, go through it and highlight the things that are worthwhile but do not ever erase/tear out pages. Your research notebook should be a stream of consciousness, not a finished document.
 
physics girl phd said:
I like teeny composition-size notebooks that have graph-paper pages -- like 100 pages total and 5 squares/inch grid. I guess I've been much better when I've used these smaller notebooks (to limit the date range). I code my data by date... so if I know what data I'm analyzing on my computer, but want to details I would have written in the notebook, then it's easy to find. To make things even more sparse, I try to use the "front side only" (or right page) for important notes what's going on with the project itself at the present moment (settings about the system for certain named data files, etc.), and the "back side" for scribbling other stuff (notes about conversations with others, possible directions the project might go, little math "scribbles" or system "doodles" etc. This makes for a fair number of little notebooks on the shelf -- depending on how large you write and how much, maybe 4-5 or more per year), but at least nothing really large on the desk or lab table at one time.

Note however, that I do know some friends whose jobs require them to use a certain type of notebook (with carbon-copy pages) and submit the copies to their company (sometimes each day). For that, obviously you're stuck just what the company/lab might want. And in my experience, those things are rather large ( Nonetheless, you might be able to divide your page in half or something. Or maybe use different colors of pen. Black for your directly project related stuff, and blue for random asides.
At the moment, I'm not required to keep a project log, so I'm free to use whatever kind of book I want, so I'll probably go get myself a little notebook.

The problem with the black/blue pen thing is that I never seem to know at the time what's important and what isn't. My project right now is a computer model, so the majority of my work is 'baby steps.' A lot of the project is me trying out little ideas and testing them so there's no real line between what's project related and what's a random idea. What generally differentiates the two is whether or not the little idea works.

Dr Transport said:
The best thing to do is write everything into a bound notebook/lab book. Every couple of days, go through it and highlight the things that are worthwhile but do not ever erase/tear out pages. Your research notebook should be a stream of consciousness, not a finished document.

Would it maybe be a good idea to keep one book that contains all my rough work and little ideas, and then have another book (or maybe computer document) that records the stuff that ended up being relevant? That way I have a more concise list of stuff that worked that I could use for presentations or hand in, but I also have a record of all my musing, which I can look back on if needed.
 
thegreenlaser said:
At the moment, I'm not required to keep a project log, so I'm free to use whatever kind of book I want, so I'll probably go get myself a little notebook.

The problem with the black/blue pen thing is that I never seem to know at the time what's important and what isn't. My project right now is a computer model, so the majority of my work is 'baby steps.' A lot of the project is me trying out little ideas and testing them so there's no real line between what's project related and what's a random idea. What generally differentiates the two is whether or not the little idea works.



Would it maybe be a good idea to keep one book that contains all my rough work and little ideas, and then have another book (or maybe computer document) that records the stuff that ended up being relevant? That way I have a more concise list of stuff that worked that I could use for presentations or hand in, but I also have a record of all my musing, which I can look back on if needed.



One notebook is really all you need. If you want to have a concise record of milestones, that is what an hour on Friday afternoon doing powerpoint slides is for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
717
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K