How Is Effective Weight Calculated in a Spinning Carnival Ride?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Violagirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight
AI Thread Summary
The effective weight of a girl in a spinning carnival ride is calculated using the formula we = m √(g² + (v²/R)²), where g is gravitational acceleration, v is her speed, and R is the radius of the cage. This approach utilizes the Pythagorean theorem because the gravitational force and centripetal acceleration act in perpendicular directions. The effective weight is greater than her actual weight (mg) due to the additional centripetal force. Understanding the vector components of these forces clarifies the need for the Pythagorean theorem in this context. This discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the directions of forces when calculating effective weight in non-linear motion scenarios.
Violagirl
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On a carnival ride, a girl of mass m stands in a cylindrical cage of radius R. The cage is spun about its cylindrical axis so that her speed is v. What is her effective weight?

Homework Equations


we= mg-ma

wxe = mv/R2, wey = -mg

The Attempt at a Solution


This is an example problem in my book and I'm not sure how they put everything together to solve it. Upon presenting the above forumulas, it says to next use the Pythagorean theorem for it to get:

we = m √g2 + (v2/R)2

Then goes on to say that the girl's effective weight is greater than mg.
I'm not sure how they set up their formula into the Pythagorean formula from the formulas above. Any clarification would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mg-ma is only the effective weight when the acceleration and gravity are in the same direction (or with sign of 'a' reversed for opposite directions). But in this problem, gravity and acceleration are not parallel or anti-parallel.

Think about the centripetal and gravitational forces. Which directions will they be in? From this, you can see why they use Pythagoras' formula.
 
BruceW said:
mg-ma is only the effective weight when the acceleration and gravity are in the same direction (or with sign of 'a' reversed for opposite directions). But in this problem, gravity and acceleration are not parallel or anti-parallel.

Think about the centripetal and gravitational forces. Which directions will they be in? From this, you can see why they use Pythagoras' formula.

Oh! Ok, that makes more sense, I didn't understand in reading my textbook, thanks for clarifying! So then, they each form their own vectors in coming together to produce a triangle, which is why Pythagorean Thorem is needed. Thank you!
 
yep, that's it :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top