Efficiency of Carnot Engine Question

linford86
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is from "Equilibrium Statistical Physics" by Plischke and Bergerson, problem 1.1:

"Consider a Carnot engine working between reservoirs at temperatures T1 and T2. The working substance is an ideal gas obeying the equation of state [ PV=Nk_BT ], which may be taken to be a definition of a temperature scale. Show explicitly that the the efficiency of the cycle is given by

\eta=1-\frac{T_2}{T_1}

where T_1>T_2.

Homework Equations



The first law of thermodynamics, the ideal gas law, and a few other things. I'll introduce these in my partial solution; I hope that's not inappropriate.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I began by noting that the efficiency is defined as \eta=\frac{W}{Q_1}. We also know that W=Q_1+Q_2, using the convention that heat leaving the system is negative. For the sake of reference, I will define that the Carnot engine moves through points A, B, C, and D, and that AB is isothermal at temperature T_1, BC is adiabatic, CD is isothermal at temperature T_2, and DA is adiabatic. For the process from A to B, since it is isothermal, the internal energy does not change. By the first law of thermodynamics, we have that:

dU=0=\bar{d}Q-\bar{d}W and, thus, \bar{d}Q=\bar{d}W

Next, we have that \int_A^B \! dQ=\int_A^B P \, dV=Nk_BT\ln(\frac{V_B}{V_A}. Likewise, Q_2=Nk_BT\ln(\frac{V_D}{V_C}). Simplifying the equation for \eta, we have:

\eta=1+\frac{\ln(\frac{V_D}{V_C}}{\ln(\frac{V_D}{V_C}}

I understand that, for an adiabatic process, TV^\gamma=(constant) and that \gamma=\frac{C_D}{C_V}, but I have no idea how to use this information to further reduce \eta to the desired result --

\eta=1+\frac{T_2}{T_1}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From adiabatic process (BC and DA), we have:

<br /> T_{2} V_{b} ^\gamma ^- ^1 = T_{1} V_{c} ^\gamma ^- ^1<br />

<br /> T_{2} V_{a} ^\gamma ^- ^1 = T_{1} V_{d} ^\gamma ^- ^1<br />

From 2 eq, we shall get:

<br /> \frac{V_{b}}{V_{a}} = \frac{V_{c}}{V_{d}}<br />

Plug it to efficiency to get a result.
 
Ha, that's so obvious! Thanks!

How do I mark this thread as "Solved"? I tried looking under "Thread Tools" but I didn't see an option for doing that...
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top