Efficiently Learning & Retaining Course Material

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Material
AI Thread Summary
Effective studying in mathematics requires more than just taking notes from the course book. While writing down important theorems, proofs, equations, and graphs is a common practice, it may not lead to deep understanding or long-term retention. Active engagement with the material is crucial; students should question the concepts, explore the validity of theorems, and seek alternative proofs. This critical thinking fosters a deeper grasp of the subject. Additionally, consistent practice through problem-solving is essential for retention. Revisiting material regularly helps reinforce knowledge, as math is a discipline where concepts can easily be forgotten without ongoing application. Integrating new concepts with previously learned material can also enhance understanding and retention, making it easier to recall information long after exams.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
The way I study is I read through the course book and while I read I write down everything that I feel is important, but this takes a lot of time and its not very effective.

Typically the things I will write down are:
1.Theorems
2.Proofs
3.Equations- and how they arrived at the equation
4.Graphs and pictures

To me learning the above info is important but I would like some advice. I know this question will have a different answer for every individual but what is the best way to learn and understand a subject and retain the information? I don't just want to retain it for test day I would like to develop an understanding of the material to where it is easily recalled years later.

Also should I not worry so much about writing all the information down and just read through the book then work the homework problems?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you are studying mathematics. If so, just copying the book onto your notes will not teach you the material. As others have stated in previous threads, you have to be active in your learning. Question the material, think independently. When seeing a new theorem, questions you can ask yourself are for example:
-Is the converse true? If not, why? Can you find a counterexample? What conditions are needed (if any) to make the converse hold (if possible)?
-Why are the assumptions in the theorem neccesary? Can they be relaxed?
-Can you find an alternative (shorter?) proof?

There questions can be very hard depending on the subject matter, but you can answer them, you are well on your way towards an intimate understanding of the material. In short, more than taking notes or doing problems, you have to ponder the material!
 
If I could figure out how to retain information beyond the exams I'd have it made--as it is, I'm lucky if I remember the beginning of the class when I'm taking the final. I think doing lots of practice problems helps, but if you want to remember something, math is pretty much use it or lose it. If you're not revisiting the material from time to time, you will likely forget it, even if you understood it quite well.
 
I'd say go beyond the material you're trying to study and see it unified with other concepts. If go ahead and work on harder material you'll look back at the things you were struggling with in your exams as trivialities for the most part.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top