Efficiently Solve Motion Problems Using Energy Conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a motion problem involving a ball's maximum height using energy conservation principles. The poster struggles with applying certain kinematic equations, specifically questioning why one formula yields incorrect results while another provides the correct answer. They mention an initial velocity of 8.9 m/s at a 35-degree angle and express confusion about the time variable used in their calculations. Other participants clarify that all standard constant acceleration formulas should work, suggesting that the poster may have miscalculated the time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying formulas in motion problems to achieve accurate results.
majormuss
Messages
124
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I just came across this question and i think its giving me a real hard time.
This is part of a bigger question so I'll provide the other statements below
7 The maximum height reached by the ball is
approximately
(1) 1.2 m (3) 4.9 m
(2) 2.5 m (4) 8.5 m

Homework Equations


t=1 s and therefore half way is 0.50s
V(i)=8.9m/s
angle is 35 degrees
Viy= 4.9m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, why is it that I can't use certain formulas in Solving some motion problems even though everything seems to work ok. I tried using this formula...d=V(i)t +1/2at^2... but my answer turns out wrong. and this one rather gives me the answer...Vf^2=Vi^2 + 2ad...why is that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Since you know the initial velocity, why not try to solve it using energy conservation?
 
Hi majormuss! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
majormuss said:
t=1 s and therefore half way is 0.50s

Viy= 4.9m/s

First of all, why is it that I can't use certain formulas in Solving some motion problems even though everything seems to work ok. I tried using this formula...d=V(i)t +1/2at^2... but my answer turns out wrong. and this one rather gives me the answer...Vf^2=Vi^2 + 2ad...why is that?

All the standard constant acceleration formulas will work. :wink:

I expect you got t = 0.5 s wrong … where did that come from?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top