How Does Ehrenfest Theorem Apply to Particle Position in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noblegas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use ehrenfest theorem (i*\hbar*d<Q>/dt=(\varphi(t),[Q,H],\varphi(t)) to show that the expectation value of the position of a particlee that moves in 3 dimensions with the Hamiltonian H=p^2/2m+V(r) satisfies d<r>/dt=<p>/m

Homework Equations

(i*\hbar*d<Q>/dt=(\varphi(t),[Q,H],\varphi(t))

or d<Q>/dt=<-i[Q,H]/(\hbar)

The Attempt at a Solution



[Q,H]=QH-HQ=Q((-i*\hbar*d/dx)^2/2m+V(r))-((-i*\hbar*d/dx)^2/2m+V(r))(Q)=Q*(\hbar)^2 d^2/dx^2*1/2m +QV(r)-(\hbar)^2 d^2Q/dx^2*1/2m+V(r)Q=QV(r)-(\hbar)^2 d^2Q/dx^2*1/2m+V(r)Q not sure how to continue this problem

Perhaps i should say: i*\hbar*d<r>/dt=[\varphi, [r,H]\varphi]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody find a hard time reading the latex code or all of the country
 
noblegas said:
Perhaps i should say: i*\hbar*d<r>/dt=[\varphi, [r,H]\varphi]

That looks like the best starting point to me...what do you get when you do that?
 
i*\hbar*d/dt=[\varphi, [r,H]\varphi]=[\varphi, [r,p^2/2m+V(x,t)]\varphi]=[\varphi, (r*p^2/2m+V(x,t)-p^2/2m+V(x,t)*r)\varphi]=1/(i*\hbar*2*m)*<[x,p]*d(p^2)/dp>=(<i*\hbar*2*p>)/(i*\hbar*2*m)=<p>/m? Please take a look at my latex code because I don't think latex displayed all of my solution
 
Your \LaTeX is terrible!

Click on the image below to see how to generate something more legible:

i\hbar\frac{d\langle r\rangle}{dt}=(\varphi, [r,H]\varphi)=(\varphi, [r,p^2/2m+V(r)]\varphi)

You need to be careful to only use square brackets to represent commutators,and round brackets otherwise. There is also no need to use the * symbol to represent multiplication, it just makes things look messy. And you should use \frac when appropriate. Also, your potential is given to you as a function of r...why would you write it as a function of x and t?

continue from here...
 
<br /> i\hbar\frac{d\langle r\rangle}{dt}=(\varphi, [r,H]\varphi)=(\varphi, [r,p^2/2m+V(r)]\varphi)=1/(2*\hbar*m*i)*(&lt;[x,p]d(p^2)/dp&gt;)=1/(2*\hbar*m*i)*(&lt;[i*\hbar*2p&gt;)=&lt;p&gt;/m<br /> hope this is better
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top