Eigen values and cubic roots question

iamsmooth
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
So I found the characteristic equation of a matrix, and I know the roots of the equation are supposed to be the eigenvalues. However, my equation is:

\lambda^3-2\lambda^2

I have double checked different row expansions to make sure this answer is correct. So don't worry about how I came to get that equation.
I'm just not sure how to get roots from this. Would it be:

\lambda^2(\lambda-2)

So that the roots are 0 and 2?

Basically I have trouble with cubic roots, I guess this is less of a question about eigenvalues than it is about cubic roots.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right about your example (note 0 is a double root).
In general cubic equations are no fun. Your options are:
1. Factor, like you did above
2. Guess an answer \lambda_0, then divide out (\lambda-\lambda_0) and solve the resulting quadratic equation. This works well in constructed problems where you can easily see that a value like 0, 1, -1, 2 or -2 satisfies the equation.
3. Use the analog of the quadratic formula ((-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac})/2a) for cubic equations. However it is messy, and unlike the quadratic formula hardy anyone knows it by heart.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top