Eigenenergies of finite square well

secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Is there any website where I can find the analytic form of the eigenenergy of a 1-D finite square well potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure there is,but don't u have a textbook...?IIRC,there's a nice presentation of this problem in Davydov.

Any QM textbook ought to have finite square well...

Daniel.
 
secret2 said:
Is there any website where I can find the analytic form of the eigenenergy of a 1-D finite square well potential?

There's no explicit analytic expression for the energy eigenvalues of a finite square well. To get them, you have to solve a transcendental equation (two of them actually, one for odd-parity eigenfunctions, one for even-parity). This gives you numeric solutions to whatever precision you need.

Unless of course someone has defined some kind of special function to fill the fill, but I've never heard of any such thing.

Do a Google search for "finite square well" (with the quote marks) and you'll find plenty of Web sites. Some of them probably include the transcendental equations in question.
 
In fact, I am working on a variational method problem. I am asked to prove that any finite square should have at least one bound state. So I plug in a Gaussian trial function to the square well potential. The variational method give neatly V (which is the "depth" of the well). Just want to check if this makes sense.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top