Eigensolution of the wave function in a potential field.

Yourong Zang
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Consider a potential field
$$V(r)=\begin{cases}\infty, &x\in(-\infty,0]\\\frac{\hslash^2}{m}\Omega\delta(x-a), &x\in(0,\infty)\end{cases}$$
The eigenfunction of the wave function in this field suffices
$$-\frac{\hslash^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}+\frac{\hslash^2}{m}\Omega\delta(x-a)\psi=E\psi$$
A textbook gives the following solution:
$$\psi(x)=\begin{cases}Asin(kx), &x\in(0,a)\\ sin(kx+\phi), &x\in(a,\infty)\end{cases}$$
where
$$k^2=\frac{2mE}{\hslash^2}$$
2. Homework Equations
I can clearly understand the first part but in the second part, why does the amplitude of the function equal to 1 and why is there a phase angle?


And is this wave
$$\psi(x)=\sin(kx+\phi)$$
called something like the "excitation mode"?


3. The Attempt at a Solution
A solution about delta potential is not what I want. There is an infinite potential on the left+a delta potential.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yourong Zang said:
A solution about delta potential is not what I want
It can still help you understand why the amplitudes are different for this scattering problem
 
The amplitude is set to one to describe an incoming wave from the right (*). Can't be normalized, so it's a mathematical simplification to study solutions of the SE

(*) plus the reflected wave: because of the step everything has to go back again
 
BvU said:
The amplitude is set to one to descibe an incoming wave from the right. Can't be normalized, so it's a mathematical simplification to study solutions of the SE
So I guess what I need is only the ratio of these two amplitudes (A in this case)?
 
Right ! Follows from boundary conditions (as in the link in the other thread)

I suppose the ##\phi## is on the right because at 0 you can only have a sine factor
 
  • Like
Likes Yourong Zang
BvU said:
Right ! Follows from boundary conditions (as in the link in the other thread)

I suppose the ##\phi## is on the right because at 0 you can only have a sine factor
Great, thank u.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top