Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a non-symmetric matrix?

prajeesh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a non symmetric matrix AB where A and B are symmetric matrices. How can I find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of AB?

In a paper( Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis by M Welling), the author asks to find eigenvalues and eigenvectors of B^(1/2)* A *B^(1/2) which is a symmetric matrix. But how can I get eigenvalues and eigenvectors of $AB$ from eigenvalues and eigenvectors of B^(1/2) A B^(1/2)?

Could someone please help me?

I tried the solution suggested by others. But it doesn't work
A=
[2,-1,0;
-1,2,-1;
0,-1,2];
B=
[32,-12,8;
-12,34,-21;
8,-21,13];

eigenvectors of AB=[0.516537330395033,-0.781188319935242,-0.0177964973702446;-0.710088559129181,-0.185707982205180,0.521054279012559;0.478501227273470,0.596034692062496,0.853337988726655];

eigenvectors of B^(1/2)* A* B^(1/2)= [0.517933641073670,-0.855373946305353,-0.00895295628145857;-0.725005239437560,-0.444501257554748,0.526104585439372;0.453995755742558,0.265996323309655,0.850372747536919];

product of B^(-1/2) and eigenvectors of B^(1/2)* A *B^(1/2) =[0.0692193234209673,-0.179045453961740,-0.160160577798552;-0.0951564325356731,-0.0425635779871867,4.68925725410385;0.0641222410443052,0.136608931923259,7.67966316565345];

Both are different. Is there any mistake in what I did?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Product of two symmetric matrices doesn’t possesses nice properties unless the matrices commute (in that case the product is also symmetric). It can be non-diagonalizable. Even it is diagonalizable, there is, in general, no correspondence between eigenvectors of A B and of factors themselves.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top