Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of observables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian operator H, defined as H = 1/2 h Ω (|0⟩⟨1| + |1⟩⟨0|). Participants express uncertainty about whether to convert bra and ket notation into matrix form and how to represent these states as matrices. There is a clarification that the states |0⟩ and |1⟩ are orthonormal and that the matrix elements should be calculated using ⟨i|H|j⟩. The eigenstates can be expressed in terms of the basis states |0⟩ and |1⟩, which are essential for solving the problem. Understanding the representation of these states in matrix form is crucial for finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
Fixxxer125
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of
H= 1/2 h Ω ( ]0><1[ + ]1><0[ )

Homework Equations



I know H]λ> = λ]λ>


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know if I am meant to concert my bra's and ket's into matrices, and if so how to represent these as matrices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me make your post look a bit prettier:
Fixxxer125 said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of
$$\hat{H} = \frac{1}{2}\hbar\Omega (|0\rangle\langle 1| + |1\rangle\langle 0| )$$

Homework Equations



I know ##\hat{H}|λ\rangle = λ|λ\rangle##.


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know if I am meant to concert my bra's and ket's into matrices, and if so how to represent these as matrices?
Are the states ##| 0 \rangle ## and ##| 1 \rangle## orthonormal? If so, just calculate the matrix elements ##\langle i |\hat{H}|j \rangle##.
 
Thanks! In the solution given the Eigenstates are given in terms of the |0⟩ and |1⟩ states in the Hamiltonian. How do I know what these states are in terms of matrices so I can write the eigenstates in terms of these? Cheers
 
Those two states are the basis you're using, so...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top