Eigenvalues of 4x4 Hermitian Matrix (Observable)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the allowed energies for a spin-3/2 particle using a given Hamiltonian represented by a 4x4 Hermitian matrix. Participants are exploring methods to determine the eigenvalues of this matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of calculating the determinant to find eigenvalues and are exploring alternative methods, such as rearranging the matrix into block forms. There is a discussion about whether swapping rows and columns can simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the rearrangement of the matrix, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the properties of block matrices and whether there are theorems that support their proposed methods. There is a sense of seeking clarification on algebraic manipulations and their implications for finding eigenvalues.

Gunthi
Messages
65
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the allowed energies for a spin-3/2 particle with the given Hamiltonian:
[tex]\hat{H}=\frac{\epsilon_0}{\hbar}(\hat{S_x^2}-\hat{S_y^2})-\frac{\epsilon_0}{\hbar}\hat{S_z}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


The final matrix I get is:

\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{3}{2} & 0 & \hbar\sqrt{3} & 0\\
0& \frac{\hbar}{2}-\frac{1}{2} & 0 &\hbar\sqrt{3} \\
\hbar\sqrt{3}& 0 & \frac{\hbar}{2}+\frac{1}{2} & 0\\
0& \hbar\sqrt{3} & 0 & \frac{3}{2}
\end{pmatrix}

My question is: Is there a more quick way to find the eigenvalues of a 4x4 hermitian matrix than going trough the tedious calculation of [itex]det(\hat{H}-\lambda I)=0[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Gunthi! :smile:
Gunthi said:
Is there a more quick way to find the eigenvalues of a 4x4 hermitian matrix than going trough the tedious calculation of [itex]det(\hat{H}-\lambda I)=0[/itex]?

If you swap the second and third rows, it becomes two 2x2 matrices. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Gunthi! :smile:


If you swap the second and third rows, it becomes two 2x2 matrices. :wink:

Hi tiny-tim! :smile:

I would also have to switch the 2nd and 3rd columns right? Then I would just calculate the eigenvalues of the 2x2 matrices separately?

I've been searching for properties of block matrices that could justify this, but to no avail. Is there a theorem that demonstrates this property? Or could you explain how this works?

I guess I'm rustier than I thought at my algebra :redface:
 
Hi Gunthi! :smile:
Gunthi said:
… I've been searching for properties of block matrices that could justify this, but to no avail. Is there a theorem that demonstrates this property? Or could you explain how this works?

We're only re-arranging

instead of the basis x y z t (or whatever), we're using x z y t :wink:

To put it another way, can't you immediately see, just by looking at it, that the matrix is in two parts that operate completely separately? :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K