Eigenvector orthogonality and unitary operator diagonalization

Gary Roach
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For reference: Problem 1.8.5 parts (3) , R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics.
Given array \Omega, compute the eigenvalues (e^i^\theta and e^-^i^\theta). Then (3) compute the eigenvectors and show that they are orthogonal.

Homework Equations


Eulers equation needed:
e^\pm^i^\theta = \cos\theta \pm i\sin\theta

The matrix;
\Omega = \left |\begin{array}{cc}\cos\theta& \sin\theta\\-\sin\theta& \sin\theta\end{array} \right|



The Attempt at a Solution


Computer eigenvectors (Some QM ket notation used)
|\omega = e^i^\theta > \Rightarrow \left|\begin{array}{cc}\cos\theta - (\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)& \sin\theta \\-\sin\theta& \cos\theta - (\cos\theta +i\sin\theta) \end{array} \right |

|\omega = e^i^\theta > \Rightarrow \sin\theta\left|\begin{array}{cc}-i& 1\\-1& -i \end{array}\right |
Since the array must equal the zero array, \sin\theta can be eliminated and:
-ix_1 + x_2 = 0 \\<br /> -x_1 + -ix_2 = 0 \\<br /> \Rightarrow x_1 = -ix_2

So the eigenvector should be:
|\omega = e^i^\theta &gt; = \left|\begin{array}{cc}-i\\1\end{array}\right| \\ letting&amp; x_2=1

Similarly:
|\omega = e^-^i^\theta &gt; \Rightarrow \sin\theta\left|\begin{array}{cc}i&amp; 1\\-1&amp; i \end{array}\right |
ix_1 + x_2 = 0 \\ <br /> -x_1 + ix_2 = 0 \\ <br /> \Rightarrow x_1 = ix_2
So the eigenvector should be:
|\omega = e^-^i^\theta &gt; = \left|\begin{array}{cc}i\\1\end{array}\right|

I think I have all of this right but unfortunately these two vectors are supposed to be orthogonal implying that their inner product sould be zero. And:
\left|\begin{array}{cc}-i\\1\end{array}\right| \cdot \left|\begin{array}{cc}i\\1\end{array}\right| = 1+1 =2 \neq 0 ??

It's probably a stupid error but I can't find it. Any help will be sincerely appreciated. I hope this get cleaned up in the final version. The preview feature won't show corrections.

Gary R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inner product here is <a,b>=conjugate(a^(T))b. You forgot the complex conjugate on the first vector.
 
Oops. There seems to be a hole here in my knowledge. Oh well, back to the books. Thanks for the prompt reply.

Gary R.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top