Eikonal equation and trajectory of a ray of light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilDSP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Ray Trajectory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the eikonal equation and its implications for the trajectory of a ray of light, as well as its connections to earlier work by J. J. Thomson. Participants explore the derivation of the equation, its limitations, and its applicability in different contexts, including optics and particle motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the equation derived from Born and Wolf's "Principles of Optics" and questions the limitations and derivation details.
  • Another participant states that the eikonal equation is approximately correct only when the wavelength is much smaller than the typical variation length scale, introducing a condition involving the wavenumber.
  • A different approach to deriving the eikonal equation is suggested, using Fermat's principle and the calculus of variations, as well as Huyghen's wavelets.
  • A participant mentions that the equation in question may stand apart from the eikonal equation, implying it may not share all its limitations, suggesting further derivation is necessary.
  • One participant offers a resource with an informal derivation of the eikonal equation and its forms, linking to external notes.
  • Another participant elaborates on J. J. Thomson's specification of group velocity and presents several equations relating to particle motion and the index of refraction.
  • There is a clarification regarding the applicability of the derived equations to photons versus charged particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the limitations and derivations of the eikonal equation, with no consensus reached on the implications of the equation or its applicability in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of conditions under which the eikonal approximation holds, as well as the potential breakdown of the approximation when certain parameters approach specific limits.

PhilDSP
Messages
643
Reaction score
15
On page 122 of Born and Wolf's "Principles of Optics" the following equation for the trajectory of a ray of light is glibly derived in association with the eikonal equation.

\frac{d}{d \bf s} (n \frac{d \bf r}{d \bf s}) = \nabla n
where n is the index of refraction and r is the displacement vector

This equation is extremely interesting because much earlier J. J. Thomson developed it into an equation of motion for the electron. But details in its derivation are sadly missing in both places.

What are the limitations? Does the equation degenerate as the wavelength approaches zero? Does anyone have references to a more detailed derivation?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
It is only approximately correct if the wavelength is much smaller than the typical variation length scale. In other words,
##|k^{-2}||\nabla k| \ll 1##
where k is the wavenumber.

If k goes to zero somewhere, then the eikonal approximation breaks down.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
You can derive the eikonal equation by using Fermat's principle and the calculus of variations.

The alternative approach is to start with Huyghen's wavelets.
 
Thanks Khashishi and UltrafastPED. That equation stands a bit apart from the eikonal equation and so doesn't necessarily inherit all of the eikonal equation's limitations. So it seems that the only way to know the details is to do the work of deriving that equation from scratch.
 
I give an informal derivation of both forms of the eikonal equation, along with some discussion in lecture 10 of Notes on Analytical Mechanics: "Connection to Optics".

Available (free) here: https://sites.google.com/site/ultrafastped/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Excellent! Thanks again
 
J. J. Thomson specified, by the way, that {\bf v} will represent the group velocity of a particle from which we can get the relationships

d {\bf s} = {\bf v} dt and {\bf v} = nc

Hence
\frac{d}{d \bf s} (\frac{\bf v}{c} \frac{d \bf r}{d \bf s}) = \nabla n
and
\frac{1}{\bf v} \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{1}{\bf v} \frac{d \bf r}{dt}) = \frac{c}{\bf v} \nabla n
or
\frac{d^2 \bf r}{dt^2} = nc^2 \nabla n
Equating \frac{d^2 \bf r}{dt^2} with the acceleration of the particle and allowing the particle to have mass we get
{\bf F} = m{\bf a} = mnc^2 \nabla n
This applies to a [STRIKE]charged[/STRIKE] elementary particle only of course which is not close to any boundary

P.S. I've striked through the word charged as evidently the equation before inserting mass applies to a photon.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K