Einstein; The principle of relativity and the law of propagation of light.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Einstein's "Principle of Relativity" asserts that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. This principle appears incompatible with the law of propagation of light, as demonstrated by De Sitter's observations of double stars, which indicate that the speed of light is constant regardless of the motion of the source. The discussion highlights that while Maxwell's Equations are invariant under Lorentz Transformations, classical electrodynamics remains consistent with Special Relativity, suggesting that the principle of relativity and the propagation of light can coexist under specific conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Principle of Relativity
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's Equations
  • Knowledge of Lorentz Transformations
  • Basic concepts of classical electrodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz Transformations on classical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between Maxwell's Equations and Special Relativity
  • Investigate the experimental evidence supporting the constancy of the speed of light
  • Review the historical context of Einstein's theories in relation to classical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of modern physics and the interplay between light and motion.

Shad0w
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2.Explain in your own words what Einstein means by “the principle of relativity”, and why it seems to be incompatible with the theory of electromagnetism (or “the law of propagation of light”).

Homework Equations


Not an equation but Einsteins answer can be seen here in section 7
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Relat...ion_of_Light_with_the_Principle_of_Relativity


The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, here's my attempt. I'm posting it here because I get the feeling I may have entirely missed the point Einstein was trying to put across, and would like correcting if that is the case...

Einsteins “Principle of relativity”, is that for a Galileian co-ordinate system moving relative to another Galileian co-ordinate system (used as the reference body) in a straight line, the general laws of physics apply relative to the moving co-ordinate system in the exact same way as they do with respect to the reference body co-ordinate system. However the Dutch astronomer De Sitter, by observing double stars, was able to show that the velocity of propagation of light cannot depend on the velocity of motion of the body emitting the light. Therefore, applied to the principle of relativity, if light is traveling relative to the reference body co-ordinate system in the same direction as the moving co-ordinate system, then as viewed from the moving co-ordinate system the light would be traveling at the accepted velocity of light minus the velocity of the moving co-ordinate system (ie; slower than the speed of light). So the law of propagation of light could not apply to both the stationary co-ordinate system and the moving co-ordinate system, so either the principle of relativity or the law of propagation of light must be wrong.

It's pretty badly worded at the moment, but I'd just like to know if my explanation is along the right lines. The deadline for this question is tomorrow afternoon so help before then would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Maxwell's Equations (on which the whole theory of classical electrodynamics is based) are invariant under Lorentz Transformations--the transformations of Special Relativity. Classical Electrodynamics is thus completely consistent with Special Relativity. Galilean transformations follow from Lorentz Transformations in the low speed limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K