Einsteins light beam Lets go for a ride again

  • Thread starter Thread starter tiger51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Light
tiger51
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Einsteins light beam...Lets go for a ride...again

I am not directly in the physics field, but I use physics at work and have always been enamored by it. If I did not post this question in the right place forgive me.

So here is my ponder if you will. I read Walter Isaacson's book when it came out a few years ago, and kept thinking and imaging riding that beam of light that Einstein rode many times in his head. Than I thought about the power of light. If you have a flat plane (imagine our world is indeed flat) and turned on a light and you start backing up while always looking at the light. Soon the light to you the observer has faded with the distance. Does this mean the beam of light has stopped? if riding at the tip of the beam does that mean that you would stop to? Then increase that size to the sun and start backing about from the sun at some point the light can not go any further I imagine, so where is the absolute light? I think about this because we use light to calculate time in light years. right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Does this mean the beam of light has stopped?

no, it just means the beam is spreading out with distance and hence becoming attenuated...weaker...the beam dims as the surface area of a square increases from the source...

like a hose you spray...the water flow weakens with distance from the nozzle..but don't take that analogy to far...
 


Then increase that size to the sun and start backing about from the sun at some point the light can not go any further I imagine,

Not really true, gravity and electromagnetic waves (light) extend to infinity but of course approach zero strength at infinite distance. On the other hand, if you get far enough away from a light source, the universe may be expanding fast enough that the light will never reach your location...yet tomorrow there will be some cosmic background radiation visible to us that was not visible yeterday...
 


tiger51 said:
I think about this because we use light to calculate time in light years. right?
No, a light-year is the distance traveled by light in one year.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
View full post »

Thread '1-Way Speed of Light'

Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Einstein thought experiment confusion: “light clock in a moving frame”
Replies
5
Views
1K
B If light beam travels through a vacuum, then through diamond, then through more vacuum...
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Teaching Minkowski diagrams effectively
Replies
15
Views
2K
B Why do you need a light clock?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Leave the science to Scientists. Just tell me what is SR.
Replies
29
Views
3K
Who Hits Wall First: Light Beam or Light Traveller?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Understanding Michelson Morley Experiment
Replies
14
Views
3K
B Let me ask a thing about the Speed of Light
Replies
6
Views
1K
I SR flat Lorentzian manifold and Anderson simultaneity convention
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Shining a light beam back -- relativity
Replies
28
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top