Elastic and gravitational potential energy, with friction and a box on incline.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving elastic and gravitational potential energy, specifically focusing on a box sliding down an incline attached to an elastic string. The task is to determine the coefficient of friction and the spring constant based on given parameters such as distance, angle of incline, and mass of the box.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive equations for the spring constant and coefficient of friction using energy conservation principles, but expresses confusion about the relevance of certain problem details, such as the box returning to L/2.
  • Some participants question the interdependence of the variables in the equations and suggest methods for eliminating one variable to solve for the other.
  • Others express skepticism about the results obtained, particularly regarding the possibility of a zero coefficient of friction.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different approaches to isolate variables. Some guidance has been offered regarding manipulating the equations to eliminate variables, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct path forward or the validity of the results obtained so far.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the problem may have been designed to yield straightforward results, which raises questions about the assumptions made in the setup. The original poster notes a desire for equations that do not involve both unknowns, highlighting a potential constraint in their approach.

Nihuepana
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Elastic and gravitational potential energy

First off, long time lurker here on his first post. Your forum seems absolutely brilliant, so I hope you can help me :)

Homework Statement



A box on an elastic string is dropped down an incline and proceeds to slide the distance L before being pulled back by the string and stopping at the distance L/2. At the starting point the string is slack. Find the coefficient of friction and the spring constant.

2i1m4ic.jpg


Known data:
  • Distance, L
  • Angle of incline, Theta
  • Mass of box, m

Homework Equations


U_{{{\it el2}}}=1/2\,k{x}^{2}
U_{{{\it grav}}}=mgy
y=\sin \left( \theta \right) L
W_{{{\it res}}}=-mg\cos \left( \theta \right) \mu\,x
{\it K1}+U_{{{\it grav1}}}+W_{{{\it res12}}}={\it K2}+U_{{{\it grav2}}<br /> }+U_{{{\it el2}}}



The Attempt at a Solution


Right, so I've basically just changed x to L plugged in my attributes into {\it K1}+U_{{{\it grav1}}}+W_{{{\it res12}}}={\it K2}+U_{{{\it grav2}}<br /> }+U_{{{\it el2}}} and solved for my variables. I did first for when the box goes from point 1 to point 2, then 2 to 3 and finally 1 to 3. All three equations give me the same answer.

k:
2\,{\frac {mg \left( \sin \left( \theta \right) -\cos \left( \theta<br /> \right) \mu \right) }{L}}
mu:
{\frac {-2\,mg\sin \left( \theta \right) +kL}{mg\cos \left( \theta<br /> \right) }}

What I don't understand is why the problem is formulated as it is (why give me the information that it springs back to L/2, if I don't need it to find the constants).
Also, I was hoping that it would be possible to get equations for the constants where the unknowns doesn't figure, i.e. an equation for the spring coefficient that doesn't have mu in it and vice versa.
I've tried with all the algebra I could think of, but nothing seems to work - is there anyone who can point me to what I'm missing?
Thanks.
Simon
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, and my compliments for the really nice diagram!

The trouble is you have μ and k in both expressions, so it isn't "solved".
You must have had these equations at one point:
mg(sinθ + μcosθ) = .5*kL and mg(sinθ - μcosθ) = .5*kL
If you subtract one from the other, you will eliminate k so you have the value of μ. Sub that into one of the original equations and solve for k.
 
Thank you very much, Inkscape and Maple makes writing here a lot easier :)
I found the expressions you mentioned from my own, but oddly enough I ended up with mu = 0, which I doubt is correct, giving the way the problem was formulated. It'll have to do for now though :)
 
I agree with that! Looks like the problem was cooked up to make the answers work out nicely.

I use SmartDraw myself, but I'm downloading Inkscape to see how it works. Draw programs are wonderful!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K