Elastic Collision / Energy Preserved

AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of a block m1=5kg colliding with a stationary block m2=10kg, energy conservation and momentum conservation principles are essential. Initially, m1 has gravitational potential energy that converts to kinetic energy as it descends. Upon collision, the velocity of m1 can be calculated using the kinetic energy just before impact. After the collision, m1 will rise to a maximum height, which can be determined by considering the energy transferred and the conservation of momentum. The analysis focuses on the energy transformations and the interaction between the two blocks during the elastic collision.
huntj106713
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m1= 5kg is released from point 1 which is 5 meters above the horizontal frictionless surface and slides down a frictionless track. It makes a head-on collision at point 2 with a block of mass m2= 10kg that is initially at rest. Calculate the maximum height to which m1 rises after the collision.

I don't know where to start... The problem doesn't give the distance between m1 and m2, just how far m1 is above the ground.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use energy conservation + conservation of momentum. You know that since the sliding block isn't losing energy to friction, that all it's energy must be in the form of kinetic and potential energy. At the point it's released, all of it's energy is in the form of gravitational potential energy. By the time it hits block 2, all of it's energy must be kinetic, so you'll be able to figure out the velocity of impact. Now, you combine what you know about energy-momentum conservation with the fact that block 1 is going to bounce a little back up the ramp, meaning you'll still have to look at gravitational potential energy and that should do it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top