ELECTRIC CHARGE AND FIELDS

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the electric field around a wire with uniform linear charge density, questioning why the electric field cannot be considered perpendicular to the curved part of a cylindrical Gaussian surface when the wire is not infinite. It is noted that electric field lines extend along the cylinder, except in the symmetry plane perpendicular to the axis. The behavior of the electric field at a distance suggests that a long wire resembles a point charge. Close to the wire, the distinction between a finite and infinite length is negligible. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately applying Gauss's law in electrostatics.
killershek
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In case of wire(having uniform linear charge density), without assuming the wire infinite long, why we can't take electric field perpendicular to the curved part of the cylindrical Gaussian surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello hek, :welcome:

There's also field lines going in the direction along the cylinder (except in the symmetry plane perpendicular to the axis).

From very far away such a wire should look like a point charge and have the corresponding field. Only close by, the difference between infinitely long and just long is minimal.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
767
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top