Electric charge on conductors , capacitors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of electric charge on capacitors compared to closely placed conductors, such as wires or circuit traces. Participants explore the factors influencing charge accumulation, including conductor geometry and spacing, and the implications for capacitance. The conversation also touches on the theoretical possibility of a capacitor that loses its charge immediately upon disconnection from a voltage source.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that charge resides on capacitor plates due to the attraction of opposite charges and the distance between them, while charges on closely placed wires dissipate when voltage is removed.
  • There is a question about whether the charge accumulation depends on the geometry of the conductors and their spacing, specifically comparing parallel plate capacitors to wires of similar surface area and spacing.
  • One participant notes that two wires placed next to each other will have a small but non-vanishing capacitance, which depends on their geometry, allowing for some charge accumulation, although it may be negligible for most practical purposes.
  • A participant suggests that a capacitor could be designed with a leaky dielectric to allow for rapid charge dissipation, but acknowledges it would be a poor capacitor.
  • Another participant expresses a need for a capacitor that maintains good isolation while allowing for charge to be switched off without lingering charge, indicating a desire for a specific functionality in capacitor behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of charge in capacitors versus wires, and there is no consensus on the feasibility of creating a capacitor that loses its charge immediately upon disconnection. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific design and functionality of such a capacitor.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the limitations of traditional capacitors in terms of charge retention and the implications of geometry on capacitance, but do not resolve the mathematical or theoretical aspects of these claims.

Crazymechanic
Messages
831
Reaction score
12
Hi I'm wondering why does the charge resides on the plates on a capacitor when it's charged but not on say two closely placed wires or circuit traces etc, well I do understand that charges stay on capacitor plates because the opposite charges tend to attract and with a distance between them they stay as close as possible for as long as possible.

So the question is more like , given the same amount of voltage does the charge accumulation depends on the conductor geometry or spacing between them ?
Say I have a parallel plate capacitor and two wires with the surface area the same as that of the plates , and the gap between each of the wires just as big as that of the plates will they ahve the same capacitance or no?



P.S. although I think it's impossible but would it be possible to make a capacitor which looses it's charge right after the source or the supply is taken away , well it wouldn't be a capacitor anymore but still , say I needed a device with which I can use + charge to attract some negative charge on the other plate but let it go just as when I disconnect the positive charge ?
As upon disconnecting a capacitor it would discharge slowly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Crazymechanic said:
Hi I'm wondering why does the charge resides on the plates on a capacitor when it's charged but not on say two closely placed wires or circuit traces etc, well I do understand that charges stay on capacitor plates because the opposite charges tend to attract and with a distance between them they stay as close as possible for as long as possible.

the 2 "parallel wires of a circuit will have a charge on the for as long as there's a voltage applied
Remove the voltage and the charge will dissipate out into the attached circuitry

P.S. although I think it's impossible but would it be possible to make a capacitor which looses it's charge right after the source or the supply is taken away , well it wouldn't be a capacitor anymore but still , say I needed a device with which I can use + charge to attract some negative charge on the other plate but let it go just as when I disconnect the positive charge ?
As upon disconnecting a capacitor it would discharge slowly.

yes of course it is possible ... you just make a capacitor that has a very leaky dielectric between the plates so that current (charge) flows between the plates and balances out.
This of course would be a VERY poor capacitor

Dave
 
Crazymechanic said:
Hi I'm wondering why does the charge resides on the plates on a capacitor when it's charged but not on say two closely placed wires or circuit traces etc, well I do understand that charges stay on capacitor plates because the opposite charges tend to attract and with a distance between them they stay as close as possible for as long as possible.

So the question is more like , given the same amount of voltage does the charge accumulation depends on the conductor geometry or spacing between them ?
Say I have a parallel plate capacitor and two wires with the surface area the same as that of the plates , and the gap between each of the wires just as big as that of the plates will they ahve the same capacitance or no?

Two wires laying next to each other will have a small but non-vanishing capacitance that indeed depends on the exact geometry of the wires such as their sizes and distances. That means that small but non-vanishing charges might indeed build up in those wires. For most purposes these charges can be considered negligible (but not always). Excellent question.
 
@davenn , well yes a poor capacitor would do , but the problem is I need a good isolation between the plate so no current (in theory) runs between them but so that when I switch the negative potential off of one of the plates the + doesn't linger on the other as it would normally do.
The purpose is so that I could switch a negative potential on the legs of two capacitors in series so that i could get charges to run back and forth between them.
The thing is with a normal capacitor I can't do that just because the cap needs to be discharged or drained to ground for it to reverse polarity.

@dauto , why would that be an excellent question , just asking ? :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K