Electric Charges (Quick Question)

AI Thread Summary
Charged particles attract neutral ones due to charge separation or polarization, where the presence of a charged object causes the electrons in the neutral object to redistribute, creating a temporary positive charge on one side. The equation Ep=-kQq/r does not apply to interactions between charged and neutral particles since one of the charges is zero, but the interaction still occurs due to the movement of electrons. In conductors, electrons can move freely, enhancing the attraction, while in insulators, the effect is limited by the bound nature of electrons. When a positively charged object approaches a neutral one, the same polarization effect occurs, leading to attraction. Overall, the attractive force arises from the induced charge separation rather than direct interaction between charged and neutral particles.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Can some one please explain to me why charged particles attract neutral ones, yet if you place the numbers into the equation Ep=-kQq/r, it will show you that there is no potential energy between a charged particle and a neutral one, because one of the Q's will be 0. How does this make sense. Also, I read somewhere that protons and electrons do not have any effect on the neutrons. I'm confoosed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
Can some one please explain to me why charged particles attract neutral ones...
Are you asking about charged particles attracting neutral particles or neutral objects? (Like a charged rod attracting bits of paper.)
 
Hmm.. I think that equation doesn't apply to almost anything, it only applies to spheres that are uniformly charged.

anyways, if you bring a charged object near neutral one, what you think would happen to electrons in the neutral object? (remember, they are free to move in the conductors)
 
I read somewhere that protons and electrons do not have any effect on the neutrons.
Usually a charged particle will not atract or repel a neutral one electrically. If you've been told they do, you have been misinformed. Your deduction from the equation is correct for particles.
 
Thanks, I thought particles and objects are the same things.
 
k, say you bring two speres (1 charged, one not) close together. Wouldn't the charged object(-) push the electrons to the other end of the sphere, thus making the side of it charged positively, would they then attracts to the charged object? ISn't there a force there? How would you calculate it?

Also, if you brought a positive(+) charged object near the neutral one instead of negative, would the attraction be weaker, due to the prontons not being able to move, thus adding some positive charge to the same side, some cancelling negative charges from the electrons?
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
k, say you bring two speres (1 charged, one not) close together. Wouldn't the charged object(-) push the electrons to the other end of the sphere, thus making the side of it charged positively, would they then attracts to the charged object? ISn't there a force there? How would you calculate it?
Note that these spheres are objects composed of gazillions of charged particles. Yes, you will get charge separation/polarization. Note that this brings the +charges in the uncharged sphere closer to the charged sphere than the -charges--thus you get an attractive force. How much charge separation depends on the nature of the objects: in a conductor, electrons are free to move; in an insulator, they are bound to the nucleus, but can move somewhat, depending upon the polarizability of the material.

Also, if you brought a positive(+) charged object near the neutral one instead of negative, would the attraction be weaker, due to the prontons not being able to move, thus adding some positive charge to the same side, some cancelling negative charges from the electrons?
You get the same thing, only in reverse. Now the electrons in the uncharged sphere move towards the charged sphere, leading to a similar attractive force.
 
Back
Top