Electric Currents in Copper Wire

AI Thread Summary
Moving a magnet, including a magnetic ball, through a coiled copper wire generates an electric current due to electromagnetic induction. The key factor is the change in the magnetic field experienced by the wire, which can occur even if the magnetic poles of the ball are moving in different directions. As long as the magnetic field varies as the ball rolls, a current will still be induced in the copper wire. The orientation of the poles does not need to remain fixed for induction to occur; it is the movement and change in the magnetic field that matter. Therefore, a magnetic ball can effectively produce an electric current in the copper wire when moved appropriately.
thedeepblue
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey all, I was wondering about a varied version of something.

I know that if you run a magnet up and down a tightly coiled tube of copper, it creates an electric current through the wire. I also know the reverse, which is that if you passed a current through that wire, while it was wrapped around a ferrous or magnetic substance, it will become magnetized (an electromagnet).

What I was wondering, is that would this still apply, if you replaced the ordinary magnet with a magnetic ball, still running it up and down the tube. (Assuming) the ball would roll over going both ways, with its poles moving around, would an electric current still be produced in the copper wire? Or would the poles have to be in the same position all the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as it is a magnet, yes, it will induce a current in the conducting coil or tube as it is inserted and pulled out.
 
But surely if the ball (hence, the poles) was moving around in random directions, the magnetic field would fail to produce a current because it is not going in a specific direction with a specific north/south force?
 
(Magnetic balls do have north and south poles)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top