Electric Displacement Vector D and Magnetic Intensity Vector H in Electromagnetism?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the understanding of the electric displacement vector D and the magnetic intensity vector H in the context of Maxwell's equations. D and H simplify the equations in the presence of matter, resembling the vacuum equations. The electric displacement vector D accounts for the polarization of materials, while the magnetic intensity vector H represents the magnetization. It is noted that matter tends to align with electric and magnetic fields, which influences the overall field strength. D and H can be viewed as representing external fields, whereas E and B reflect the actual fields, including the effects of matter. This distinction helps clarify the physical roles of these vectors in electromagnetism.
Arawn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I can understand what the electric field vector E and the magnetic flux density vector B mean, but what exactly are the meanings of the two other vectors, the electric displacement vector D and the magnetic intensity vector H? What are their physical explanations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When mattter is present Maxwell's equations take on a more simple form when E is replaced by D and B replaced by H - a form similar to the vacuum equations. The premitivity represents the polarization of the material and the permeability represents the magnitization of the material.

Pete
 
To elaborate a little:
Most types of matter have a tendency to align themselves with or against magnetic and electric fields in their vicinity, thus increasing or decreasing those fields. To a good approximation, you can often use D and H to represent the "imposed" or "external" fields, and E and B to be the real fields which will include the contributions from the matter.
 
Thanks for the replies! Things you told sound sensible, and I think I'm having a bit better understanding now.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top