Electric energy stored in dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric energy stored in a dipole consisting of charges +q and -q positioned on the x-axis. The distance between the charges is L, with a test charge P located on the y-axis at a distance r from both charges. The provided formula for the energy is W = (q^2)/(4*pi*epsilon_0*L), which is derived from the potential energy of the dipole configuration. Participants express confusion about the derivation of this formula and seek clarification on the calculations involved. Understanding the potential energy of dipoles is essential for grasping the principles of electrostatics.
mbmcgee
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
there is a +q and -q on the x-axis. the +q is L/2 in the negative direction and the -q is L/2 in the positive directions. the distance between the two charges is L. there is a test charge P on the y-axis a distance r from both charges.

we had to find the electric energy stored in the dipole.

she gave us the answer -> W= (q^2)/(4*pi*epsilon_0*L) => W=(q_1*q_2)/(4*pi*r_12)

i do not understand how she got this. could someone please enlighten me a little bit?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mbmcgee said:
there is a +q and -q on the x-axis. the +q is L/2 in the negative direction and the -q is L/2 in the positive directions. the distance between the two charges is L. there is a test charge P on the y-axis a distance r from both charges.

we had to find the electric energy stored in the dipole.

she gave us the answer -> W= (q^2)/(4*pi*epsilon_0*L) => W=(q_1*q_2)/(4*pi*r_12)

i do not understand how she got this. could someone please enlighten me a little bit?
thanks
You can calculate the potential energy of the dipole the same way in which you calculate the potential energy of any array of charges.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top