Electric Field and minimum velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the minimum velocity required for a charged ring to traverse an electric field defined by E = E0/l (xi + yj) N/C along a rod. Initially, the calculation suggested a velocity of zero, which was deemed incorrect upon further analysis. The correct approach involves integrating the electric potential until reaching the highest point of potential, specifically at (l/2, l/2). This method parallels the physics of overcoming a hill, where potential energy must be considered. Ultimately, the minimum velocity is derived from understanding the electric field's influence on the ring's motion.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Electric field given by the vector E = E0/l (xi + yj) N/C is present in the xy plane. A small ring of mass M carrying charge +Q, which can slide freely on a smooth non-conducting rod, is projected along the rod from the point (0,l) such that it can reach the other end of the rod at (l,0) . Assuming there is no gravity in the region, what minimum velocity should be given to the ring, if QE0l/M = 8

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2 mv^2 = QΔV
dV = E.ds (ds is the displacement)
dV ={ E0/l (xi + yj) } {dx i + dy j}
= E0/l (xdx + ydy)
V = E0/l ∫xdx + ∫ydy ( ∫xdx from 0 to l, ∫ydy from l to 0)
= 0

Hence velocity required is zero.
Which is terribly wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look (visually) at the field xi+yj maybe you will get some insight as to why the answer came out to be zero.

Edit:
What is the minimum velocity needed to get over a hill?
By analogy, your method is to integrate the force of gravity (dot ds) over the entire hill.
But of course, this yields an answer of zero (if the hill is the same height on both sides).
 
Last edited:
Got this one, just had to integrate till the point of highest potential, i.e. (l/2, l/2).
Thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top