Electric Field Calculation for Volume and Surface Charges?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of calculating electric fields from volume and surface charges using Coulomb's law, as opposed to Gauss' law. Key questions include the placement of r^2 in the integral and the necessity of the unit vector in calculations. It is emphasized that the electric field due to infinitesimal charge elements varies with spatial coordinates, which complicates integration. Participants suggest posting specific integration attempts in the homework section for feedback. The thread concludes with a reminder to seek clarification on calculations to resolve misunderstandings.
timothy ser
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I know you can use Gauss' law to calculate the electric field of volume and surface charges but i cannot figure out a way to do it using Coloumb's law. I have several questions about this: when you integrate the charge density in Coloumb's law over the volume is the r^2 inside or outside the integral? is the unit vector necessary to calculate within the integral or is it allowed to drop the unit vector and obtain a scalar equation for the electric field's magnitude? Lastly, when I calculate the electric field of volume charges, i notice that after I integrate, I lose spatial coordinates with which to calculate the electric field at certain points in space.

I am sorry for the long post but I have been struggling with this for sometime.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Gauss' law the electric field in a certain point in space is a superposition from electric field due to infinitesimal charge element, The E field due to single element is the same as that due to a point charge ##k\frac{q}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}## - different charge element will have different ##r## and ##\hat{\mathbf{r}}##. This means, they are dependent on the variable of integration and hence cannot be taken outside the integral.
timothy ser said:
Lastly, when I calculate the electric field of volume charges, i notice that after I integrate, I lose spatial coordinates with which to calculate the electric field at certain points in space.
That cannot be true, you should check again your calculation.
 
Can somebody due an example with both Gauss' law and Coloumb's law?
 
Choose an example that you tried to do, preferably one that you already know the answer for, from Gauss's law or otherwise. Write up your attempt at integrating Coulomb's law for it, and post it in the homework section (even though it's not a class assignment). Then people can tell you what you did wrong and give hints on how to proceed.

https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/advanced-physics-homework.154/
 
thank you
 
jtbell said:
Write up your attempt at integrating Coulomb's law for it, and post it in the homework section (even though it's not a class assignment). Then people can tell you what you did wrong and give hints on how to proceed.

Seconded. Thread locked.
 
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
859
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top