Electric field due to current carrying conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field due to a current-carrying conductor is generally not zero and can be measurable, particularly as electric potential that diminishes with distance from the wire. While an ideal conductor may exhibit a zero electric field, real conductors can have a non-zero field due to surface charge accumulation. The electric field direction near the wire aligns along the wire, while it becomes more radial at greater distances. The charge density inside the wire remains neutral due to the balance of entering and exiting electrons, but surface charges are responsible for the electric field outside the wire.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with current-carrying conductors
  • Knowledge of relativistic effects on charge density
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and charge neutrality
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric fields and magnetic fields in moving frames
  • Explore the concept of surface charge accumulation in conductors
  • Learn about electric potential and its measurement around conductors
  • Investigate the effects of wire resistance on electric field generation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and the behavior of electric fields around conductors.

pranav p v
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
Does static charge near to a constant current carrying conductor experience force on it?
I am asking this question because i have learned that electric field and mangnetic field are same thing but viewing differently with respect to the frame of reference...when a positive test charge moves ( parallel to the wire) near to the current carrying conductor ,with respect to the positive charge positive ions in the conductor are moving and due to length contraction charge density due to positive ions will be higher so net electric field will be present. that will repel the test charge... So magnetic field in the rest frame is actually electric field in the test charge's moving frame..i am ok with this .but consider when that test charge at stationary position ,it sees the length contraction of electrons ( which are moving) ... So there will be an attractive electrical force ...but if I think like the following,wire is actually neutral because at a time,number of electrons enter into the wire equal to number of electrons leave ...so in that way static test charge will not experience any force. I feel contradiction...help me

I am repeating my question, electric field due to current carrying conductor is zero or not??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
pranav p v said:
I am repeating my question, electric field due to current carrying conductor is zero or not??
For an ideal conductor it is zero. Real conductors may be slightly non zero, but for all practical purposes (including relativistic effects) you can consider it zero for a good conductor.

How familiar are you with four-vectors. The easiest explanation uses them.
 
pranav p v said:
Does static charge near to a constant current carrying conductor experience force on it?

...but consider when that test charge at stationary position ,it sees the length contraction of electrons ( which are moving) ... So there will be an attractive electrical force ...but if I think like the following,wire is actually neutral because at a time,number of electrons enter into the wire equal to number of electrons leave ...so in that way static test charge will not experience any force. I feel contradiction...help me

I am repeating my question, electric field due to current carrying conductor is zero or not??

It is not zero in general, and can be quite measurable, indirectly, as electric potential that decreases the farther from the wire you go. The direction of this field when near the wire is along the wire, when farther from wire, more radial and hard to determine - it depends on the objects in the vicinity of the wire.

The relativistic contraction of lengths does not mean that density of negative charge is necessarily higher than density of positive nuclei. The interior of the wire is to a high accuracy neutral, since any local excess is electrostatically unstable and is quickly disrupted by movable electrons from the surrounding metal.

The major effect on the electric field outside the wire is due the same charges that produce electric field inside the wire - the charges on the surface of the wire. The surface of the wire is a boundary that the charges cannot easily cross so accumulation and excess of charges can persist there. And it has to, if there is to be non-zero electric field inside the wire. These charges have nothing to do with contraction of lengths, but everything to do with resistance of the wire. For same current and wire diameter, the higher the resistance of the wire, the greater the density of surface charges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
548
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K