Electric field due to dipole in polar coordinates

AI Thread Summary
For a dipole, the electric field at a point defined by angle θ and distance r from the dipole's center can be expressed in two components: E_r along the line to the dipole and E_θ perpendicular to it. The radial component, E_r, is derived from the potential V as E_r = -∂V/∂r. The θ component, E_θ, includes a 1/r term because changing θ by dθ corresponds to a physical distance of r dθ, leading to the expression E_θ = -(1/r)∂V/∂θ. This formulation uses the gradient of the potential in spherical coordinates, which accounts for the different ways distances change in radial versus angular directions. Understanding these components is essential for analyzing electric fields in polar coordinates.
AdityaDev
Messages
527
Reaction score
33
For a dipole, if there is point subtending an angle ##\theta## at the centre of dipole and at a distance ##r## from centre of dipole, then the electric field at that point can be broken into 2 components. One along the line joining the point and centre of dipole and point given by $$E_r=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial r}$$ and the other component along the perpendicular to that line as $$E_{\theta}=-\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} $$
This is given in my book. I understood E_r. But how did they get ##E_\theta## ?
here ##V=\frac{pcos\theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2}## ,r>>a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field is minus the gradient of the potential. The equations you have written down are simply the expressions for the components of the gradient in spherical coordinates (apart from the ##\varphi## component that will be zero in this case).
 
Why is there a 1/r term in E along theta? Is sphericcal coordinates beyaond my level?
 
The components of the gradient essentially tell you how much something changes per length in that direction. If you change the radial coordinate by dr, you move a distance dr. Therefore, the radial component is ##-\partial V/\partial r##. If you change the coordinate ##\theta## by ##d\theta##, then you move a distance ##r\,d\theta## and the ##\theta## component is therefore ##-(1/r) \partial V/\partial\theta##.
 
  • Like
Likes AdityaDev
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top