Electric Field of a Charged Disk

AI Thread Summary
The area of a ring section of a charged disk is derived as 2πa da, where a is the radius and da is an infinitesimal thickness. This is explained by considering the ring as the difference between the areas of two concentric circles, leading to the simplification that the area is approximately 2πa da when da is very small. Another perspective likens the ring to a rectangle with a length of 2πa and a width of da, reinforcing the area calculation as length times width. The discussion emphasizes that using an infinitesimal value for da allows for exact area calculations through integration. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing the electric field of a charged disk.
davezhan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having a brain freeze and have a hard time understanding why the area of the ring is 2*pi*a*da. Can someone explain why it is the circumference times da?

Link to derivation: www.phys.uri.edu/~gerhard/PHY204/tsl36.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
davezhan said:
I'm having a brain freeze and have a hard time understanding why the area of the ring is 2*pi*a*da. Can someone explain why it is the circumference times da?

Link to derivation: www.phys.uri.edu/~gerhard/PHY204/tsl36.pdf

How would you write the equation for the area of that ring section? What happens when you simplify what you've written?
 
Think of the ring as the region between two circles- one of radius a, the other of radius a+ da. The area of the inner circle is \pi a^2 and the area of the outer circle is \pi (a+ da)^2. The area between them is \pi (a+da)^2- \pi a^2= \pi (a^2+ 2ada+ da^2)- \pi a^2= 2\pi a da+ \pi da^2. Since da is an "infinitesmal", its square is negligible and the area is 2\pi a da. By saying that "da is an infinitesmal" I mean that this is true in the limit sense for very small da.

Here's another way to look at it: Imagine opening that strip up to a "rectangle". It's length is the circumference of the circle, 2\pi a, and it's width is da. The area of that "rectangle" is "length times width", 2\pi a da. I have put "rectangle" in quotes because, of course, you cannot "open up" a circular strip into a rectangle. This is, again, only true in the limit sense.

If you were to take da to be any finite length, 2\pi a da would give you an approximate area, not an exact area. But you can use "da" in an integral to get the exact area.
 
Thank you for your help! The above post helped to clarify things tremendously.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top