Electric Field of a Spherical Insulator

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field of a spherical insulator with a charge density of ρ = ρo/r², one must integrate the charge density over the volume enclosed by a Gaussian surface. The charge density varies with distance, but remains constant in thin shells, allowing for straightforward volume calculations. For a Gaussian surface inside the sphere, integrate from 0 to r', while for outside, integrate from 0 to R. The resulting electric field can then be derived using the equation EA = Qencl/εo. Understanding the integration process is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Stealth849
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spherical insulator of radius R and charge density ρ = ρo/r2 where r is the distance from its centre. Find the electric field at a point inside and outside the insulator.


Homework Equations



EA = Qenclo

The Attempt at a Solution



What's throwing me off is the charge density. Setting up a gaussian sphere, I don't know what to do to find Q for the formula.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to integrate he charge density enclosed in the Gaussian surface.

ehild
 
Can you elaborate a little bit?

I'm not too sure what I should be integrating here...

ρ should be in C/m3

To get Q from ρ, I need to cancel the volume... I don't see what to integrate to achieve this though.

Thanks
 
Charge density is the charge of unit volume. If it is constant you get the charge by simply multiplying the volume with the density.
The density varies with the distance from the centre here. But it is constant in a very thin shell.
What is the volume of a shell if its radius is r and thickness Δr?

ehild
 
hm,

if i integrate surface area from 0 ro the Radius, that would give me volume..

so if I take the integral of ρ*dA from 0 to R

where dA = 4*pi*r^2*dr ?
 
Yes, that will be the whole charge of the sphere. Calculate the field from it outside the charged sphere.
If the Gaussian surface is inside the charged sphere at distance r' < R from the centre, you need to integrate from 0 to r'.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top