interesting question. You could probably calculate it by using Coulomb's law, and integrating over the charge distribution? I was thinking of one other possible way... Although I'm not certain it is correct. Um, so outside the shell, we have:
[tex]\vec{E} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} \hat{r}[/tex]
Where Q is the total charge, given by: [itex]Q=4 \pi a^2 \sigma[/itex] Where 'a' is the radius of the shell, and sigma is the charge per area on the shell. Right, so we knew that already. But now, if we imagine we are at a point very close to the the surface of the shell (but just outside it), then the part of the shell right next to this point will look approximately flat, right? So the electric field coming from that very nearby part of the shell will be:
[tex]\vec{E} = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \hat{r}[/tex]
So, I was thinking that, if we then go onto the shell itself, we are going to 'lose' this contribution to the electric field. So to calculate the electric field on the shell, we just do that - take away this contribution. So my prediction is that the electric field on the shell is:
[tex]\vec{E} = ( \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} - \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} ) \hat{r}[/tex]
And now, writing out Q fully, and recognising that r=a when we are 'on' the shell, we get:
[tex]\vec{E} = \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon_0} \hat{r}[/tex]
OK. This is my prediction... I am not at all sure if it is correct though.
Edit: and a quick sanity check, to make sure that it makes sense: we can do the same thing to get from being 'on the shell' to being 'inside the shell', so we will add a similar contribution, but with the electric field going radially inward this time, so then the electric field will equal zero inside the shell. (Which agrees with what we get from Gauss' law).