Electric Field perpendicular to surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding electric fields in relation to charged surfaces and external charges. It emphasizes that electric fields must emerge perpendicularly from equipotential surfaces, as no work is done when moving along these surfaces. The question arises about how to represent the electric field of a charge placed outside a charged body, with the suggestion that the electric field lines extend perpendicularly from the surface to the external point. A follow-up query addresses the implications of having a point on a sphere where the electric potential differs from the rest of the surface. It is argued that this scenario is problematic, as it would imply an infinite electric field at that point, making the concept of varying potential across a sphere nonsensical. The discussion concludes that while the electric field can be complex due to external charges, the idea of a point with a different potential on a sphere is fundamentally flawed.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
hello,

Sorry to ask this question again, but I am having a little trouble with it still. I found a pic on a website that should be helpful.

According to my physics text, the electric field has to emerge perpendicular from the surface. I can see how this is true. Since the surface is at equipotential, it takes no work to move along the surface. Because it takes no work the change in potential at two points must be zero, and E*dl must be perpendicular at all points. But what does that mean for a charge placed outside the body? In my pic you can see a charged particle outside the body. How would you draw the electric field there? Is the electric field just an extension of the electric field perpendicular at exactly that point out in space? (in my picture i exteneded the blue arrow wher the point charge would project itself onto the surface, and exteded it to reach the point charge, (the dotted brown extension arrow)).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I also have a follow up question. Let's say that we have a sphere, but at exactly one point on the sphere the potential is different than everywhere else on the sphere. Then that means the charge at the sphere (the electrons), would move towards that one spot. Obviously, all the electrons can't occupy the space since that area of potential difference is only a point. So would part of the sphere be at one potential and part of the sphere be at a different potential? Is it meaningful to ask a question like this, or is it wrong to say a place of different potentail on a sphere?
 
Respect to your first question, I think the electric field will be complex but the arrows will curve in such a manner that makes possible a perpendicular entrance of E if the charge is negative. Your question is not trivial because the electric field will be distorsioned owing to the presence of the charge. Maybe I misunderstood your question.

Respect to your second question, I think it has no sense thinking in such potential distribution. Keep in mind the potential would not be derivable at all in that point. If so, the electric field would be infinite at that point. It's impossible to obtain an infinite electric field, therefore your question has no sense.

I hope it can help you a bit.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top