Electric Fields - Net Charge on Point Charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two point charges, +5 microC at x=0 and +8 microC at x=0.9m, and seeks to determine where a third charge can be placed on the x-axis such that the net charge on all three charges is zero. Participants are discussing the interpretation of the problem and the calculations needed to find the magnitude of the third charge.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the conditions under which the net force on each charge is zero rather than the net charge. There are discussions about setting up equations based on the forces acting on the charges and the challenges of having multiple unknowns in their equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the initial interpretation, and suggesting methods to set up equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to compute forces rather than electric fields, and there is an ongoing exploration of how to reduce the number of unknowns in their equations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the terminology used in the problem statement, particularly the distinction between net charge and net force. Participants are also grappling with the implications of having multiple equations and unknowns in their calculations.

dh743
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two point charges are placed on the x axis: +5 microC charge at x=0 and +8 microC charge at x=0.9m. Where on the x-axis can a third charge be placed so that the net charge on all three charges is zero? Determine the magnitude of the third charge.


Homework Equations


E=[tex]\frac{kQq}{r<sup>2</sup>}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


It's difficult to type on here but basically I let E of the two given charges equal each other to find a point but I have no idea how to complete the rest of the question. The given answer is a charge of -1.56[tex]\mu[/tex]C at x=0.397m.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having the "net charge on all three charges is zero" doesn't sound right. Are you sure they aren't asking that the net force on each charge be zero? If I answer that question, I get the answers that you claim. Also, what you're calling E is really the force between the charges q and Q.
 
fzero said:
Having the "net charge on all three charges is zero" doesn't sound right. Are you sure they aren't asking that the net force on each charge be zero? If I answer that question, I get the answers that you claim. Also, what you're calling E is really the force between the charges q and Q.
Yeah you're right, it does mean the net force on each charge is zero. How did you get the answer though?
 
Place a charge q at x=r and compute the net force on each charge. By setting these equal to zero, you have a system of equations that can be solved for q and r.
 
fzero said:
Place a charge q at x=r and compute the net force on each charge. By setting these equal to zero, you have a system of equations that can be solved for q and r.
That makes sense, but how do I now arrange it to avoid having 2 unknowns?
 
dh743 said:
That makes sense, but how do I now arrange it to avoid having 2 unknowns?

You should have 3 equations in all, pick any 2 of them to solve. Post your results if you're having trouble.
 
fzero said:
You should have 3 equations in all, pick any 2 of them to solve. Post your results if you're having trouble.
Ok letting 5 microC be y and 8 microC be z, this is I've ended up with:
Ey=[tex]\frac{kq}{r<sup>2</sup>}[/tex]
Ez=[tex]\frac{kq}{(0.9-r)<sup>2</sup>}[/tex]
Eq = [tex]\frac{k(5microC}{r<sup>2</sup>}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{k(8 microC}{(0.9-r)<sup>2</sup>}[/tex]

I can't solve them because I always end up with 2 unknowns so I must have made a mistake somewhere.
 
You need to compute the forces, not just electric fields. Draw a force diagram for each charge if you need to. Charge 1 experiences a force from charge 2 and another from charge 3, and you'll get an equation that looks like

[tex]\frac{kq_1 q_2}{r_{12}^2} + \frac{kq_1 q_3}{r_{13}^2} =0,[/tex]

with similar equations for the other charges.
 
Thanks for all your help, but I still can't get it to a point where I only have one unknown - I always end up with both q and r as unknowns. And what do the subscript 12 and 13 mean in your above equation?
 
  • #10
dh743 said:
Thanks for all your help, but I still can't get it to a point where I only have one unknown - I always end up with both q and r as unknowns. And what do the subscript 12 and 13 mean in your above equation?

[tex]r_{12}[/tex] is the distance between charge 1 and charge 2, etc. As for solving for q and r, you have 3 equations to pick from. One equation depends on r but not q, so we can use that to solve for r. Either of the other two equations can then be used to solve for q.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K