Electric Potential and Spheres

AI Thread Summary
When two unequally sized metal spheres are charged and connected by a wire, they will reach the same electric potential once the wire is removed. This occurs because, in equilibrium, there is no electric field in the wire, leading to a uniform potential across both spheres despite their different charges. The potential of each sphere is determined by the formula Q/(4πε₀r), where Q is the charge and r is the radius of the sphere. Although the charges on the spheres differ, the distribution of charge adjusts to equalize the potential. Understanding that the radius refers to the sphere's size clarifies why the potentials can be the same despite differing charges.
cjosephson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Two unequally sized metal spheres are each charged. A wire is connected from one sphere to the other. When the wire is removed, the spheres will have the same potential. T/F?

The answer is true (I looked up the key), but I do not understand why.

I know that the spheres, due to being unequally sized, have different charges. But I thought potential was EPE/q, which is (Qq/r)/q, which simplifies to Q/r. If the spheres have different charges, won't the potential always be different? Can someone help explain why the potentials would be the same?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spheres have the same potential because there can't be an electric field in the wire if the charges are in equilibrium and no current flows.

This means that the charge must distribute itself in such a way that the potential on the spheres is the same.

The potential of a sphere with radius r and charge Q is. \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}

obviously Q depends on r
 
kamerling said:
The spheres have the same potential because there can't be an electric field in the wire if the charges are in equilibrium and no current flows.

This means that the charge must distribute itself in such a way that the potential on the spheres is the same.

The potential of a sphere with radius r and charge Q is. \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}

obviously Q depends on r

OK, you explanation makes sense--there can be no potential difference because of the way the charges move. When they say potential, though, what do they mean? Because the charge Q is different for each of the spheres, clearly they don't mean the potential as from a distance R--if the Q's are different, and R is the same, the clearly Q1/R != Q2/R.

Sorry if my follow-up question is vague, I'm finding it hard to phrase.
 
they're unequally sized spheres, so R is NOT the same
 
Ah, I was thinking of R as the distance away from the spheres, not the radius of the spheres. I'm doing AP Physics B, so we don't really do very much with the potential of spheres, since it's a C subject. Please excuse me!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top