Electric Potential Difference in a Circuit with Emf Devices

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sefrez
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of electric potential difference in circuits with emf devices, particularly in a simple loop circuit with a battery and a resistor. The confusion arises from the idea that while there is an electric field causing current flow, the potential difference is zero across a wire with negligible resistance. It is clarified that in such a wire, charges can flow uniformly without a net electric field or potential difference, similar to objects moving on a frictionless surface. The analogy helps illustrate that once a steady current is established, the motion of charge carriers remains unchanged despite the lack of potential difference along the wire. Ultimately, the understanding is that current can flow in a zero-resistance conductor without a potential difference across its length.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Since the beginning, seeing the first definition of electric potential difference, ΔV = ΔU/q, I have had somewhat a harder time understanding it, or more so, utilizing it. While I have begun to understand it better now, I am still quite confused as to what it means in a circuit with an emf device.

Take for example a simple single loop circuit with 1 battery with potential difference V and 1 resistor with resistance R. Assume that wires connecting the circuit are of negligible resistance. Why is it that the electric potential taken over anyone side of the circuit is constant, or its difference is zero? That is, the potential difference has to be taken over the terminals or over the resistor to obtain any potential difference.

The reason this doesn't make sense to me is that if ΔV = ΔU/q = -∫E ds and there is an electric field setup in the wire causing current flow, then as each electron flows, it surely does lose potential, even when there is no resistance because there is both electric field E and displacement ds.

I find it easier to grasp this when thinking of a similar circuit but instead with a capacitor. Here it makes sense to me as once the capacitor is charged, there is no longer flow and the build up of charge on the plates of the capacitor causes a electric field over a distance of their separation which is indeed ΔV. When you have current flow, it just confuses me though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the wires are truly without resistance then they are equipotential objects --- there would be no potential difference from end to end. And yet, current flows in such wires!

Consider a mechanical analogy where objects are sliding on a horizontal frictionless surface. They continue to move even though no change in height is occurring. The surface may be at "ground" height, or high on a plateau (high potential) without affecting the constant motion.

In a wire at some uniform potential where there is an 'entrance' for charge carriers at the same potential at one end and access to a lower potential 'exit' for charges at the other, then charges attracted to that lower potential leave a 'vacuum' that will be filled by other charges desiring to fill out the charge density in as uniform a manner as possible (like charges repel, so the charges fill up the available area like a uniform gas). When the average motion is established (after any initial impulse response has calmed down), then the wire maintains an essentially uniform potential from end to end and throughout, with a constant flow of charge carriers that doesn't require any potential difference to maintain it.
 
So essentially what you are saying is that once current reaches some fixed uniform manor, its motion state is left unchanged there after and thus there is no net electric field and no potential difference?
 
Sefrez said:
So essentially what you are saying is that once current reaches some fixed uniform manor, its motion state is left unchanged there after and thus there is no net electric field and no potential difference?

Yes, that's about it (for a zero resistance conductor).
 
Ok, thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top