Electric Potential Energy Inside a Charged Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the motion of a negatively charged point charge located just outside a uniformly positively charged sphere. It is established that the charge experiences simple harmonic motion, as derived from Coulomb's force law and Gauss' law. The potential energy equation indicates negative values inside the sphere, suggesting that energy is required for the charge to move inward, which contradicts the expected spontaneous motion. Participants clarify that potential energy is relative and that the negative values do not imply a barrier to entry. The confusion appears to stem from the interpretation of the force and potential energy signs in the equations.
Yoni V
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q<0 lies just outside a uniformly and positively (non-conducting) charged ball.
Assume the charge can pass through the ball freely. Describe the motion of the charge.

Homework Equations


Coulomb's force law, energy equation.

The Attempt at a Solution


Obviously this is simple harmonic motion and easily solved using coulomb's force law and Gauss' law, so I wouldn't even bother writing it down.
The only thing that puzzles me is the energy of the system. We get:
U(r)=kq[4/3πr3ρ]/r=kq4/3πρr2

Since q<0, the equation yields negative values inside the sphere and 0 for r=0.

This implies that the motion from the edge of the ball towards the center requires energy, which contradicts the obvious spontaneous motion of the point charge.

What am I misinterpreting?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yoni V said:
Assume the charge can pass through the ball freely. Describe the motion of the charge.
Obviously this is simple harmonic motion and easily solved using coulomb's force law and Gauss' law, so I wouldn't even bother writing it down.
Thanks
Are you sure it's SHM? What is the field inside the sphere?
 
Well, it is equivalent to the gravitational example of drilling a tunnel through the center of the earth. Both are inverse-square forces and can be proved that the effective force is only due to the inner portion of the ball.
Using Coulomb and Gauss laws we get:
F=k(4/3πr3ρ)(-q)/r2=-(4/3πρkq)r=mqa
Which gives SHM with ω2=4/3πρkq/mq

Am I mistaken?
 
Yoni V said:
Well, it is equivalent to the gravitational example of drilling a tunnel through the center of the earth. Both are inverse-square forces and can be proved that the effective force is only due to the inner portion of the ball.
Using Coulomb and Gauss laws we get:
F=k(4/3πr3ρ)(-q)/r2=-(4/3πρkq)r=mqa
Which gives SHM with ω2=4/3πρkq/mq

Am I mistaken?
Where does the charge q start?
 
At the outer edge of the ball (say at r=R)
 
Yoni V said:
At the outer edge of the ball (say at r=R)
It says 'outside'.
 
Anyway, to answer your original question, potential energy is always relative to an arbitrary reference value. You have chosen it to be zero at the sphere surface. That will make it negative inside. Not sure why you think that means it will require energy to penetrate the sphere. Just think that through again.
 
Oh, I meant just on the edge, such that it can "fall" freely into the ball.
English is not mother tongue, so sorry for being unclear.

Anyway, yes- the value itself is meaningless, but nonetheless given the above equation it increases as the value of r decreases.
Using the formula for the potential energy U=kq1q2/r (+ const.) and applying the superposition principle and Gauss' law we get
U(r)=(4/3)πρkqr2 (+ const=0).
Because q<0 and ρ>0 the energy is negative for all r>0 and zero for r=0, which means that the energy increases as I said above.

Surely my derivation of the potential energy is somehow incorrect, or perhaps it's my interpretation, but I don't understand what's wrong with it.

Thanks again
 
Yoni V said:
Because q<0 and ρ>0 the energy is negative for all r>0 and zero for r=0
Oh, I'm sorry - it's me that needed to read what you wrote again.
It's not just the energy that has the wrong sign, the force does too. It seems to stem from this:
Yoni V said:
F=k(4/3)πr3ρ(-q)/r2
Why have you inserted a minus sign on the q?
 
Back
Top