Electric Potential Energy, Point Charges and velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential energy and its impact on the velocity of two point charges. A small metal sphere with a charge of -2.90 μC is stationary, while another sphere with a charge of -7.20 μC is projected towards it. The user initially calculated the electric potential energy at a distance of 0.43 m and questioned why this value could not be directly used in the kinetic energy formula, as it suggested an increase in velocity contrary to the expected repulsive effect between like charges. After recalculating the potential energy at 0.8 m and determining the change in potential energy, the user correctly applied the conservation of energy principle to find the new velocity of 15.7 m/s. The key takeaway is the necessity of considering changes in electric potential energy to accurately assess the kinetic energy and velocity of the moving charge.
Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A small metal sphere, carrying a net charge of q1 = -2.90 μC , is held in a stationary position by insulating supports. A second small metal sphere, with a net charge of q2 = -7.20 μC and mass 1.70g , is projected toward q1. When the two spheres are 0.800 m apart, q2 is moving toward q1 with speed 22.0 m/s as in figure 1. Assume that the two spheres can be treated as point charges. You can ignore the force of gravity.

I have attached an image of the question

Homework Equations


1/2mv^2 = kinetic energy
u = kq1q2/r


The Attempt at a Solution



As my attached image shows, I have gotten the correct answer fort his question but I'm not sure how I did it.

So I began by calculating the electric potential energy (U) when q2 was 0.43m away from q1.

U0.43m = k(-2.90x10^-6 C)(-7.2x10^-6 C)/(0.43m)

U0.43m = 0.437 J

My question at this point is why can I not just plug in my value for U0.43m (0.437 J) into the kinetic energy formula?

If I do this I get:

0.437 J = 1/2(1.70/1000)(v^2)
v = 22.67 m/s

Which, I'll admit, does not make sense because this says that the velocity of q2 has increased when it should decrease because q1 and q2 have same charges, thus they should repel each other, thereby slowing down q2.

I then calculated the electric potential energy (U) when q2 is 0.8 m from q1:

U0.8m = k(-2.90x10^-6 C)(-7.20x10^-6 C)/(0.800m)
U0.8m = -.2349 J

I then subtracted U0.800m from U0.43m
= 0.437 J - 0.2349J
= 0.2026 J

I then plugged this ΔU into the kinetic energy formula
1/2mv^2 = 0.2026J
v = 15.7 m/s

Why was it necessary to find the electric potential energy of the two distances?
 

Attachments

  • Hwk 4 question 2.png
    Hwk 4 question 2.png
    25.6 KB · Views: 1,604
Physics news on Phys.org
This is because the total energy is conserved. PE + KE = constant. So if the system has PE1 at some point, and PE2 at some other point, then PE1 + KE1 = PE2 + KE2, hence PE1 - PE2 = KE2 - KE1.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top