Electric potential for a sphere of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the origin and the north pole of a sphere with equal charges placed at intervals along its equator. The total charge on the sphere is determined to be 10 µC, leading to a calculated potential of 138 kV at the origin. It is emphasized that the potential is uniform across the sphere, but confusion arises regarding the calculation for the north pole, as the initial answer was marked incorrect. The contributor suggests that the problem may require considering the arrangement of the charges rather than treating the sphere as conducting. Clarification is sought on the appropriate method for calculating the potential at the north pole given the specific charge distribution.
peaceandlove
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sphere with radius 65 cm has its center at the origin. Equal charges of 2 µC are placed at 72 degree intervals along the equator of the sphere. The Coulomb constant is 8.99×10 N·m^2 / C^2. (a) What is the electric potential at the origin? Answer in units of kV. (b) What is the electric potential at the north pole? Answer in units of kV.


Homework Equations


---


The Attempt at a Solution


The capacitance of an isolated sphere is C = 4*π*ε0*R = (1/K)*R where K = electric constant = 8.99*10^9 N-m²/C². C = 7.23*10^-11 F. The total charge on the sphere is 2*10^-6*(360/72) = 10*10^-6 C. It doesn't matter where the charges are, the conducting sphere will have the same potential at all points on the surface and inside the sphere. V = Q/C = 10*10^-6 / 7.23*10^-11 = 1.38*10^5 V = 138 kV.

The "north pole" would be at the "top" of the sphere, the equator being defined by the location of the charges. Of course, there is no distinction between "top" and "bottom", but it doesn't matter, since the potential is the same everywhere on the sphere. However, my answer got marked wrong for part (b), and I'm not sure why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that the sphere is conducting. In fact, I think that you whould basically ignore the sphere, and simply consider the ring of charges. The problem is worded strangely.
 
Could you please explain how you would solve for (b)? Since there are 2 µC at 72 degree intervals along the equation, I tried dividing 2 µC by C, but that is wrong as well.
 
Are you familiar with this equation?
V = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\sum_i\frac{q_i}{r_i}
If not... you have some catching up to do :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top