Electric potential of charged concentric spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the charge q_1 on an inner conducting sphere such that the electric potential at its surface is zero, given a charge q_2 on an outer concentric sphere. Using Gauss' law, it is established that the relationship between the charges is q_1 = - (R_1/R_2) q_2. The potential at the inner sphere's surface is derived to be a combination of the potentials from both spheres, leading to the conclusion that if q_1 were zero, the potential could not be zero as required. The participants agree that the proposed "official" solution suggesting q_1=0 is incorrect. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding electric potential in systems of concentric spheres.
FranzDiCoccio
Messages
350
Reaction score
43

Homework Statement



Two conducting concentric spheres of negligible thickness. The radii of the spheres are R_1 and R_2, respectively, with R_2>R_1. A charge q_2 is placed on the external sphere.
A charge q_1 is placed on the internal sphere.

Assume that the electric potential is zero infinitely far from the center of the spheres.

Find q_1 such that the potential on the inner sphere is zero.

Homework Equations



  • Gauss law: \Phi(\vec{E}) = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}
  • Potential of a point charge (such that V=0 for d=\infty): \displaystyle V= k \frac{Q}{d}.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using Gauss' law I can say that, if only the outer sphere was present,
V_2 = k \frac{q_2}{R_2}
on its surface and inside it. Hence, at radius R_1,
V_1 = k \frac{q_2}{R_2}
If only the inner sphere was present
V_1 = k \frac{q_1}{R_1}
on its surface
When both spheres are present, on the surface of the inner sphere
V_1 = k \frac{q_2}{R_2}+k \frac{q_1}{R_1}
If we want V_1=0, it should be
\frac{q_2}{R_2}=- \frac{q_1}{R_1}
and hence
q_1=- \frac{R_1}{R_2} q_2

It seems to me that this makes sense. The potential would be
V_2 = \frac{k} q_2 \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{r}\left(1-\frac{R_1}{R_2}\right) &amp; r\geq R_2 \\<br /> \frac{1}{R_2}-\frac{1}{r}\frac{R_1}{R_2} &amp; R_1 \leq r \leq R_2<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.<br />

Assuming that q_2&gt;0, the potential grows when the outer sphere is approached from outside, reaches its maximum on the surface of the spheres and drops to 0 when it reaches the inner radius...
Inside that, it stays zero.I'm asking here just to be on the safe side.
I came across a (kind of "official") solution for this exercise that in my opinion does not make any sense. It concludes q_1=0.

[edited]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks good to me. The "kind of official" solution does not: If the charge on the inner sphere were zero it would have no influence on the potential at its surface, and so the potential there would have to be the same as that of the surface of the outer sphere which is not zero as required by the problem.
 
Hi gneill,

thanks for your insight. I was pretty sure that the proposed solution could not be correct. Other than the final result, the entire derivation seems really shaky, but there's no point in repeating a wrong reasoning.
I needed some support because I'm a bit rusty on this stuff, and I was afraid I was missing a subtle point.
Thanks again
 
There are online video tutorials that cover this topic which may be of interest. Google: Potential in a System of Concentric Shells
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top