Electric potential VS change in electric potential

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential in a conductor is defined as the energy per unit charge relative to a reference point, typically at infinity where potential is considered zero. For a charged shell, the potential inside is constant and can be calculated using the formula V = kq/r, where q is the charge and r is the distance from the charge. When dealing with multiple concentric shells, the electric field and potential must be calculated for different regions, considering the contributions from each shell. The potential difference (ΔV) is determined by integrating the electric field, and it is essential to clarify the reference point for accurate calculations. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving problems related to electric potential in conductors.
JLABBER
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Δv=v?
what is the electric potential in a conductor? LETS set the conductor be a shell carrying charge 15nC, then what is the electric potential inside the conductor? should it be just finding v=kq/r? Or we have to find the Δv? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JLABBER said:
Δv=v?
what is the electric potential in a conductor? LETS set the conductor be a shell carrying charge 15nC, then what is the electric potential inside the conductor? should it be just finding v=kq/r? Or we have to find the Δv? Thanks
Electric potential is the energy that a unit charge by virtue of its position relative to some other location. It is always relative.

Electric potential v = kq/r is the work done on a unit charge in moving it from a distance r=∞ from charge q to its position a distance r from charge q. The potential energy of a unit charge at position r relative to a position r', is the difference between the potential energy of unit charge at r relative to r=∞ and the potential energy of a unit charge at r' relative to r=∞.

So in order to answer your question, you have to tell us what you are measuring potential energy per unit charge relative to.

AM
 
Last edited:
Well, i have two conditions which both of them have not been so clear for me.

First, two concentric shells (conductors), one with charge 10nC (inside) and another with charge -15nC(outside).Inner shell has radius a and outer shell has radius b.

Then, if we are suppose to find electric field for inside the innerest shell, on inner shell, between the shells, on outer shell and outside both shells.

Which or how are we going to calculate them. We have to start from the outermost shell to find the potential first?
But, for me i do hear that the electric potential is everywhere constant inside the conductors. Therefore, for me ,

the potential outside both shell, i calculate through
ΔV=Vr - V∞=∫-E dr ( upper limit be r and lower limit be ∞)=k(q1-q2)/r-0=k(10-15)n/r.

the potential on outer shell, Vb=k(-5)n/r=k(-5)n/b.
the potential between the shell, ΔV=Vr-Vb=∫-E dr ( upper limit be r and lower limit be b)=kq1/r-kq1/b. Thus, rearrange, Vr=kq1/r-kq1/b+Vb=k10n/r-k10n/b+K(-5)n/b((This part i start to be blur))

Then the potential on shell a, Va=k10n/r-k10n/b+K(-5)n/b=k10n/a-k10n/b+K(-5)n/b

Next, then i have little idea of how to continue...
(this part start to knock here and there)

Lets see this example first before proceed to the next condition. Thanks for your concern.

(Additional out of topic question: when are you online most frequently. May be we can have a chat to clear the blurry faster)
 
Since electric potential is the electric potential energy per unit charge, it is relative. Potential energy is always relative.

Your equation V=kq/r, to my perspective, is relative to point of infinity where potential is zero, since V=∫E·dx(from infinity to r)=∫kq/x^2·dx=-kq/x|(r, ∞)=kq/r. But I don't think that calculating potential from infinity is not handy in calculation of circuit question.
 
yes, i know that. That is why i feel the next following solution become not so correct.

the potential on outer shell, Vb=k(-5)n/r=k(-5)n/b.
the potential between the shell, ΔV=Vr-Vb=∫-E dr ( upper limit be r and lower limit be b)=kq1/r-kq1/b. Thus, rearrange, Vr=kq1/r-kq1/b+Vb=k10n/r-k10n/b+K(-5)n/b((This part i start to be blur))

Then the potential on shell a, Va=k10n/r-k10n/b+K(-5)n/b=k10n/a-k10n/b+K(-5)n/b

Next, then i have little idea of how to continue...
(this part start to knock here and there)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top