Electrical force between charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electrostatic force exerted by a charge (q1 = 3μC) at a distance of 3 meters. The initial calculation used the formula Feq1 = 1/(4πε0)*(q1/r), leading to a force of 89.9 kN, which seemed excessively large. Participants pointed out that the formula was incorrectly applied, as it should include r² in the denominator, reflecting the correct relationship for electrostatic force. The correct approach would yield the electric field strength rather than the force at a point. Clarification on the formula and its application was essential for resolving the confusion.
Latsabb
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
edit: I see that my title is incorrect. This isn't between charges, it is between a charge and a point, sorry about that.

The problem:
Find the magnitude of the electrostatic force that works on a point 3 meters from q1.

q1=3μC

My attempts:
Feq1=1/(4πε0)*(q1/r)
r=3m
1/(4πε0)=8.988x109

Feq1=8.988x109*(3x10-6/3)=89.9kN

As far as I can tell, this is the way it should be done, but the force seems pretty large... Is there something that I am missing? Or is this actually correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Latsabb said:
edit: I see that my title is incorrect. This isn't between charges, it is between a charge and a point, sorry about that.

The problem:
Find the magnitude of the electrostatic force that works on a point 3 meters from q1.

q1=3μC

My attempts:
Feq1=1/(4πε0)*(q1/r)
r=3m
1/(4πε0)=8.988x109

Feq1=8.988x109*(3x10-6/3)=89.9kN

As far as I can tell, this is the way it should be done, but the force seems pretty large... Is there something that I am missing? Or is this actually correct?

Well, you can start by checking the units in your calculation, in particular Coulomb's constant. Are your formula and calculation dimensionally correct?
 
Coulombs constant is N·m²/C², while q1/r would be C/m. So put together that would give me N*m/c... That means that there should be a C²/m², which I know to be q0*q1/r2 but that is between two charges, not the force at a point.

I guess that means that Feq1=1/(4πε0)*(q1/r) isn't an actual equation? Which leaves me confused, because that is what was given to me in someone's notes...
 
I spoke with the person I got the notes from, and it should have been r2 in the denominator, which would give me N/C, or the field strength. Thank you for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top