How High Can Electrical Potential Get Near Large Charges?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at a point 3 meters away from two charges, 3μC and 6μC. The initial calculations mistakenly presented potential energy instead of electric potential, leading to confusion over the high values obtained. It is clarified that the correct unit for electric potential is volts, not joules. The charges used are significant enough to produce high voltages at the given distance, which is expected. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between potential and potential energy in electrostatics.
Latsabb
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
The problem is to find the potential at a point that is 3 meters away from two charges. (one 3 meters above, and the other 3 meters below)

q1=3μC
q2=6μC

I put that Ep=Epq1+Epq2

Epq1=K*q1/r1
Epq2=K*q2/r2

K=1/(4πε0)=8.988x109

This gives me:

Epq1=8.988x109*(3x10-6/3)=8988J

Which immediately set some bells off for me. Isnt that quite a bit of energy for a charge three meters away? By the same formula, Epq2 equals 17976J, for a total potential of 26964J. Maybe I am wrong, but it seems like a very high potential. I will admit that I haven't wrapped my head around how large of charge a Coulomb is, so maybe 3μC and 6μC are very large amounts of charge, but something seems wrong to me...

Can someone take a look, and see if I did something wrong? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Latsabb.

Note that you are calculating potential, not potential energy. The unit of potential is not J.

A μC is a large amount of charge for a particle. So, a large value of potential in this problem is to be expected.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok, thank you. Being that I am not calculating potential energy, that would make this... Volts? So I should be replacing my Ep's with V?
 
Yes. So, you are getting some "high" voltages because your charges are on the order of a few μC and your distances are on the order of a few meters.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top