Electroanalytical Chemistry HELP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lady Woodie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemistry student's assignment on electroanalytical chemistry, specifically addressing two questions about electrode geometries and cyclic voltammetry. For question 2a, the student is trying to determine which electrode geometry would exhibit the smallest current, with the understanding that current is dependent on electrode surface area. In question 2b, the student calculates the peak current for dopamine oxidation using a cyclic voltammetry equation, but faces confusion regarding units and the absence of certain parameters. Feedback from peers emphasizes the importance of using correct units and constants in calculations, pointing out errors in the student's current value. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of electroanalytical calculations and the need for precision in experimental parameters.
Lady Woodie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hey I am a third year chemistry student out on a gap year and I've been given an assignment on electroanalytical chemistry only some things don't make sense!

questions are:
2a) the concerted 2 electron 2 proton oxidation of the neurotransmitter serotonin is studied using several different electrode geometries. assume all experimental variables other than the electrode geometry is constant. explaining your reasoning which of the following exhibits the smallest current?
1. a 4.0um x 4.0um square electrode
2. a 15.0 nm x 3.0 um band electrode
3. a 2.0um diameter disc electrode
4. a ring electrode with outer radius of 1.0um and inner radius of 0.5um
??

2b) the reversible oxidation of dopamine is a 2 electron process. a cyclic voltammetric oxidative peak current of 2.2uA is observed for a 0.4mM solution of dopamine in phosphate buffer at a glassy carbon disc electrode of 2.6mm2 area with a scan rate of 25mV s-1. what will the peak current be under similar conditions except with a scan rate of 100mV s-1 and a concentration of 1.2mM??

any help would be fab thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
2a - there are equations that show how the current changes for different geometries, but at first approximation it will be just electrode surface dependent.

2b - there is a simple equation that shows how the CV peak current depends on the concentration, number of electrons, diffusion coefficients, electrode area and a scan rate. Use it.
 
rite okies...well for 2a i am using the equation i = nFSj. is that correct?
i am however using 1 for the flux as it is not stated neither is the time to work the flux out. so say 2a i) i = nFS = 2 x 96485.4 x 16 = 3087532.8mV?

and for the CV equation i am using ip = SD0.5 n1.5 v0.5 c
there is no D stated so i am leaving that out giving me an answer of
ip= 2.6 x 2^1.5 x 100^0.5 x 1.2 = 88.246uA?

am i on the rite track do you think?

thanks
 
Lady Woodie said:
rite okies...well for 2a i am using the equation i = nFSj. is that correct?

Do you understand what "compare surfaces" mean?

3087532.8mV?

You have tried to calculate current. Your answer is 3 kV. Neither units nor value range makes sense. If your plan was to shock me with the most absurd answer possible - don't bother, I have seen what students can do :-p

In 2b - express the current in terms of i=constant*things that are given in correct powers. Calculate this constant value - and use it to calculate current for the other case.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
18K
Back
Top