Electrolysis of water to make transporting easier

AI Thread Summary
Transporting water as a liquid is significantly easier and more efficient than transporting hydrogen and oxygen gases, primarily due to water's high density and lower risk of explosion. For large-scale projects, building pipelines for water is more practical than using gas, which requires larger infrastructure and poses safety concerns. Additionally, transporting electricity directly may offer better efficiency than converting water to gases through electrolysis. Establishing a new town in a remote area also presents challenges in attracting residents and managing resources effectively. Overall, while electrolysis is an interesting concept, traditional water transport remains the more viable option.
nige1234
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

Let us say I want to set up a nice new town in middle of Australia (it is all desert), 500km from the coast, and 1000km from the closest fresh water.
1, I need to desalinate the sea water.
2, I need to transport that water to the site.
3, I need to run power to the site.

Is there a better way such as the below?
1, Convert sea water to Hydrogen and Oxygen gas via electrolysis. (And lots of power)
2, Pump the gases over the long distance.
3, Use a fuel cell to convert gases back to drinkable water. Possibly storing the gases for later use, much like a battery
4, Harness electricity from the fuel cell.

So my questions are:
1, Would this EVER be the best way?
2, What factors would need to be met for it to be a real option?
3, Is pumping a gas in this case better than pumping as a liquid?

Hope you can help me think this through.

Regards, Andrew
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Water is way easier to transport than hydrogen(+oxygen). You could just transport hydrogen, of course, but water is really easier to do - it has a high density, so the pipes can be smaller. In addition, water cannot xplode and diffusion through the pipes is negligible.
This assumes that you want to build a really large city. For a small city, you don't need such a long pipeline, trucks plus a good water management are probably cheaper.

I guess electricity lines have a better efficiency than electrolysis.
 
Now all you have to do is convince people to move to the middle of nowhere.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top