Electromagnetic damping and conductivity of metals

maltesers
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The following data shows the conductivity of 5 metals and the rate of change in gravitational potential energy due to induced current when the metal is passed through a electromagnetic field of 5.4mT on the end of a pendulum. you know, the classic eddy current experiment.
I'm just wondering if anyone knew an equation linking the conductivity and rate of energy disipation? It looks like an exponential relationship to me. Anyone know exactly what it is? Would be really helpful! cheers

Material Rate of change in Gravitational conductivity
potential energy(10^-4J/s) (10^6 siemens/m)

Steel 3.53 1.5
Nickel silver 3.62 3.5
Zinc 3.71 17
Aluminium 4.47 35
Copper 8.46 58
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry that table didnt come out properly
 
conductivity is a MATERIAL property, while PE is an OBJECT property.
IF each material was made into an object of the same dimensions (l,w,h)
AND were moved through the magnet at the same speed,
THEN then power dissipated by macroscopic electromagnetic phenomena
should be proportional to (magnetic mu)^2 (electrical conductivity).

I'd guess your data includes a lot of microscopic EM phenomena (friction).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top