Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the output voltage of a car generator at different RPMs, specifically from 950 RPM producing 12.4 V to 2500 RPM. Participants explore the relationship between RPM and angular velocity, noting that RPM is directly proportional to angular velocity. A proposed method involves setting up a proportion to find the new voltage output. However, the consideration of back EMF is raised, which opposes the motion according to Lenz's law, leading to confusion about its relevance if other factors remain constant. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying Faraday's Law in practical scenarios.
airkapp
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
The generator of a car idling at 950 rpm produces 12.4 V. What will the output be at a rotation speed of 2500 rpm assuming nothing else changes?

I'm guessing that is easier and I'm looking to make it harder. I can't find anything in my textbook involving rpm. I'm thinkin to use this formula
E = NBAw but I'm actually not quit sure how to approach the problem.

is N my rpm? and then I do an initial rpm and final rpm sequence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
N is number of loop... \omega is the angular velocity...

the rpm (rotation per minute, or radian per minute) is directly proportional to the angular velocity... does that make sense to you?
 
vincentchan said:
N is number of loop... \omega is the angular velocity...

the rpm (rotation per minute, or radian per minute) is directly proportional to the angular velocity... does that make sense to you?


so i could set this up as a proportion?

950/12.4 V =2500/x Volts ?

thanks.
 
I think you should also consider the back EMF.
 
ramollari said:
I think you should also consider the back EMF.

sorry, I'm not following. If all things remain constant why would I consider that? The back emf oppose the motion (Lenz's law) correct, but if everything remains constant... :confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top