Electromagnetic induction and Lenz's law

AI Thread Summary
Lenz's law explains that the direction of induced current in a solenoid opposes changes in magnetic flux. When a magnet's north pole approaches a solenoid, the galvanometer deflects in one direction, while moving the south pole toward the solenoid causes the galvanometer to deflect in the opposite direction. This is because the solenoid generates a magnetic field that resists the movement of the magnet, requiring the magnet to do work. The discussion emphasizes that regardless of the magnet's orientation, the induced current will always act to oppose the change, ensuring conservation of energy. Understanding this principle clarifies the relationship between magnetic movement and induced electrical energy.
kthouz
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
hi!
Actually am learning Lenz's law but am just getting confused.i know that the change of a magnetic field around a solenoid creates electricity. meaning that when we move the north pole of the magnet towards the end of the solenoid, the galvnometer deflects in one direction and when we move it away from the galvanometer, this one will deflect in the opposite direction.
Now my question is: we don't change the end of the solenoid but we change the magnet poles. Now if we use the south instead of the north, is the generated current in the same direction as the one generated in the first case? why?
thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lenz's law states that current will flow in a direction to oppose the change in magnetic flux. Thus, if you switch the magnet around and instead move the south pole, the opposite will happen. (Moving towards the solenoid with the South pole will cause the opposite deflection as moving towards the solenoid did with the North end)
 
It's terrible the way I imagine personality in inanimate objects, but the way I have always used Lenz's law is -- The coil says to itself: "I want to make that magnet's job more difficult. What magnetic field would I have to create in order to repel the magnet that's moving toward me, or to attract the magnet that's moving away from me? After I have answered that, what direction of current would I need, in order to produce such a magnetic field?"
 
mikelepore said:
It's terrible the way I imagine personality in inanimate objects, but the way I have always used Lenz's law is -- The coil says to itself: "I want to make that magnet's job more difficult. What magnetic field would I have to create in order to repel the magnet that's moving toward me, or to attract the magnet that's moving away from me? After I have answered that, what direction of current would I need, in order to produce such a magnetic field?"
Wow what a cute imagination. Thank you a lot, i think i ll never be confused no more with this way of thinkin! Now i got it
 
It has to be difficult to move the magnet, regardless of which way you're moving it, because the magnet has to be required to overcome a force, so that it will have to do work in order to move. Then the work that the magnet does will be equal to the electrical energy that comes out of the coil. If you got electrical energy out, and the magnet didn't have to put work in, conservation of energy would be violated.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top